Table 2. Participant and study characteristics, and physiological adaptations and main findings.
Article, year | Country | Participants characteristics (mean±SD age, activity level, % women) | Sample size), | Duration of intervention | Exercise(s) | BFRT group exercise parameters | Control group exercise parameters | Progression for BFRT group | Progression for Control group | Main findings in physiological adaptations in strength and muscle size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bowman et al., 2020 | USA | total age:26.2±3.4 Trained young adults 58% women |
BFR-RT, n = 14 LL-RT, n = 10 |
2 sessions per week for6 weeks | External rotation Internal rotation Biceps curl Triceps extension Prone horizontal abduction |
4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 30% 1RM 60% LOP (Delfi system©) |
Same training parameters without BFR | Weight was increased as needed to accomplish 7–8 RPE |
Weight was increased as needed to accomplish 7–8 RPE |
↑30%, 23%, 22%, and 13% in scaption, flexion, abduction, and grip strength in favour of the BFRT group, respectively ↑arm and forearm circumferences in favour of the BFRT group (p<0.01) |
Brumitt et al., 2020 | USA | total age:25.0±2.2 53% reported resistance training for the shoulders more than once per week 43.5% women |
BFR-RT, n = 24 LL-RT, n = 22 |
2 sessions per week for 8 weeks |
External rotation | 4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 30% 1RM 50% LOP (Delfi system©) |
Same training parameters without BFR | NA | NA | Significant within-group supraspinatus and external rotators strength gains for both BFR and LL-RT group (p<0.001) No between-group differences in supraspinatus (p = 0.750) and external rotator strength (p = 0.708) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (p = 0.610) |
Green et al., 2020 | USA | range 20–29 years Trained young adults 0% women |
BFR-RT, n = 6 HL-RT, n = 5 |
2 sessions per week for4 weeks | Bench press Scapular retraction External rotation Bent over row |
4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions Each exercise was performed within 7 min 1 minute rest between-exercise 20% 1RM 50% LOP (Delfi system©) |
Same exercises without BFR 3 sets 10/10/10 repetitions 70% 1RM |
NA | NA | No between-group significant strength differences (p>0.05) ↑within-BFRT strength for pectoralis major, lower trapezius, and 1RM for prone rows (p<0.05) ↑within-control group strength for pectoralis major, lower trapezius, external rotators, and 1RM for scapula retraction (p<0.05) |
Lambert et al., 2021 | USA | BFRT age:27.6±4.3 Control age:25.8±4.1 Untrained young adults 28% women |
BFR-RT, n = 16 LL-RT, n = 16 |
2 sessions per week for8 weeks | Internal rotation External rotation Side lying external rotation Scaption |
4 sets 30/15/15/fatigue repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 2 minutes rest between-exercise 20% of isometric max 50% LOP (Delfi system©) |
Same training parameters without BFR | 1 lb per week per exercise if 75 reps achieved for both weekly sessions | 1 lb per week per exercise if 75 reps achieved for both weekly sessions | ↑shoulder region lean mass in the arm in favour of the BFRT group (p<0.05) ↑isometric strength (p<0.001) and strength endurance (p<0.01) for IR at 0° of ABD in favour of the BFRT group |
Salyers, 2017 | USA | total age:22.1±1.5 Trained young adults 0% women |
BFR-RT, n = 4 HL-RT, n = 4 |
3 sessions per week for 4 weeks |
Bench press | 4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions 45 secs between-set rest 20% 1RM LOP: RPE 7/10 with elastic band |
Same exercises without BFR 3 sets 15/15/15 repetitions 90 secs between-set rest Started with 65% 1RM |
Weekly increased over 4 weeks 20% 1RM 25% 1RM 30% 1RM 32.5% 1RM |
Weekly modified over 4 weeks 65% 1RM/15 repetitions 75% 1RM/10 repetitions 80% 1RM/8 repetitions 85% 1RM/6 repetitions |
No significant between-group differences in body composition and strength measurements (p<0.05) |
Thiebaud et al., 2013 | USA | BFRT age:59.0±2.0 Control age:62.0±2.0 Untrained older adults 100% women |
BFR-RT, n = 6 HL-RT, n = 8 |
3 sessions per week for 8 weeks | Chest press Seated row Seated shoulder press |
3 sets 30/15/15 repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 30 secs to 2 minutes between-exercise rest 10–30% 1RM based on 7–9 RPE on OMNI-RES AM scale 80-120mmHg LOP (KAATSU-Master device©) |
3 sets 10/10/10 repetitions 2 min between-set rest 30 secs to 2 minutes between-exercise rest 70–90%1RM based on 7–9 RPE on OMNI-RES AM scale |
Weekly increased LOP over 4 weeks 80mmHg 90mmHg 100mmHg 110-120mmHg |
Exercise modified to reach a 7–9 RPE on OMNI-RES AM scale | ↑within-group strength increases in chest press, seated row, shoulder press (p<0.05) and pectoralis major thickness in both groups (p<0.05) No between-group differences in lean body mass, strength, and muscle thickness (p>0.05) |
Yamanaka et al., 2012 | USA | total age 19.2±1.8, Trained young adults 0% women |
BFR-RT, n = 16 LL-RT, n = 16 |
3 sessions per week for4 weeks | Bench press | 4 sets 30/20/20/20 repetitions 45 secs between-set rest 20% 1RM LOP restricted by elastic band (pulled to overlap 2 inches) |
Same training parameters without BFR | NA | NA | ↑within-group strength and girth measures for both groups (p<0.05) ↑bench press 1RM (7% within-group), upper and lower chest girths (within-group 3% and 3%, respectively), and left upper arm girth in favour of the BFRT group (p<0.05) |
Yasuda et al., 2010 | Japan | BFRT age:25.8±6.3 Control age:25.6±3.2 Trained young adults (no resistance training for a year) 0% women |
BFR-RT, n = 5 LL-RT, n = 5 |
6 sessions per week for2 weeks | Bench press | 4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 30% 1RM LOP using an elastic band: The training air pressure started at 100mmHG |
Same training parameters without BFR | Training pressure started at 100mmHG and was increased by 10 mmHg each day until 160 mmHg (Day 7) | NA | Significant increase in triceps brachii (8%) and pectoralis major muscle (16%) thickness in favour of the BFRT group (p<0.05) compared to the non-BFRT group Significant increase (p<0.05) in 1-RM bench press strength (6%) in favour of the BFR-T (6%) group compared to the non-BFRT group |
Yasuda et al., 2011 | Japan | HI-RT age:25.3±2.9 BFRTL age:23.4±1.3 BFRTC age:23.8±2.1 Control age:23.6±1.6 Trained young adults (no resistance training for 6 months) 0% women |
HI-RT, n = 10 BFRTL, n = 10 BFRTC, n = 10 Control, n = 10 |
3 sessions per week for8 weeks | Bench press | 4 sets 30/15/15/15 repetitions 30 secs between-set rest 30% 1RM LOP elastic band: The training air pressure started at 100mmHG and was increased by 10 mmHg each day until 160 mmHg (Day 7) |
HI-RT: 3 sets 10/10/10 repetitions 2–3 minutes between-set rest 75% 1RM BFRTC: performed BFRTL twice a week and HI-RT once a week |
1-RM was assessed after 3 weeks to adjust the training load for BFRTH. Training load was constant for BFRTL | NA | Similar increases in bench press 1-RM in the HI-RT (19.9%) and BFRTC (15.3%) groups and lower in the BFRTL group (8.7%, p<0.05) ↑11.3% and 6.6% in maximal isometric elbow extension for BFRTH and BFRTC, respectively ↑8.6%, 7.2%, and 4.4% in the cross-sectional area of the triceps brachii for HI-RT, BFRTC, and BFRTL, respectively Significant change in relative isometric strength (3.3%) in favour of HI-RT (p<0.05) compared to BFRTL (-3.5%) and control (-0.1%) groups |
Abbreviations: ABD, abduction; BFRT, blood flow restriction training; C, combined high intensity resistance training and low BFRT; HI-RT, high intensity resistance training; IR, internal rotation; L, low; LOP, limb occlusion pressure; NA, not applicable; OMNI-RES AM, OMNI Resistance for active muscle scale; RM, repetition maximum; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; SD, standard deviation; secs, seconds.