Table 2.
Comparison with the state-of-the-art baselines on dataset.
Models | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1-score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AlexNet (2012) [43] | Normal | 0.868 | 0.785 | 0.785 | 0.878 |
Osteopenia | 0.799 | 0.793 | 0.793 | 0.687 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.931 | 0.882 | 0.882 | 0.756 | |
| |||||
VGG-19 (2014) [44] | Normal | 0.856 | 0.994 | 0.765 | 0.847 |
Osteopenia | 0.756 | 0.795 | 0.655 | 0.825 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.900 | 0.894 | 0.941 | 0.939 | |
| |||||
GoogLeNet (2015) [45] | Normal | 0.899 | 0.976 | 0.849 | 0.886 |
Osteopenia | 0.811 | 0.871 | 0.655 | 0.869 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.911 | 0.902 | 0.980 | 0.947 | |
| |||||
ResNet-50 (2016) [41] | Normal | 0.911 | 0.874 | 0.936 | 0.888 |
Osteopenia | 0.868 | 0.894 | 0.802 | 0.907 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.956 | 0.995 | 0.986 | 0.976 | |
| |||||
ResNet-101 (2016) [41] | Normal | 0.938 | 0.958 | 0.924 | 0.925 |
Osteopenia | 0.871 | 0.917 | 0.750 | 0.911 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.933 | 0.940 | 0.882 | 0.961 | |
| |||||
DenseNet-121 (2017) [46] | Normal | 0.897 | 0.982 | 0.840 | 0.884 |
Osteopenia | 0.849 | 0.841 | 0.871 | 0.889 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.952 | 0.967 | 0.843 | 0.972 | |
| |||||
ShuffleNet (2018) [47] | Normal | 0.926 | 0.970 | 0.896 | 0.913 |
Osteopenia | 0.856 | 0.911 | 0.716 | 0.902 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.931 | 0.924 | 0.980 | 0.959 | |
| |||||
EfficientNet (2019) [48] | Normal | 0.926 | 0.976 | 0.892 | 0.913 |
Osteopenia | 0.871 | 0.904 | 0.784 | 0.910 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.945 | 0.943 | 0.961 | 0.968 | |
| |||||
Joint framework (ours) | Normal | 0.971 | 0.964 | 0.976 | 0.964 |
Osteopenia | 0.933 | 0.970 | 0.836 | 0.954 | |
Osteoporosis | 0.957 | 0.962 | 0.922 | 0.975 |
The bold value indicates that this is the best model results.