Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;13:4805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31496-w

Table 4.

Results of Logistic regression models of the effect of FamRS on risk of prevalent and incident diabetes

FamRS categories Outcome: Prevalent T2D Outcome: Incident T2D
OR* CI (95%) p-value OR* CI (95%) p-value
Unadjusted FamRS 2 2.08 [1.45–2.92] 4.05 × 10–5 1.40 [0.85–2.19] 0.165
FamRS 3 4.73 [3.04–7.20] 1.77 × 10–14 3.46 [1.85–6.09] 5.89 × 10–5
Adjusted for Age + Sex + BMI + Physical activity FamRS 2 2.47 [1.67–3.61] 4.30 × 10–6 1.60 [0.95–2.58] 0.062
FamRS 3 4.33 [2.65–6.95] 2.17 × 10–9 3.74 [1.94–6.82] 3.49 × 10–5
Adjusted for Age + Sex + BMI + Physical activity + PGS FamRS 2 1.67 [1.01–2.71] 0.041 1.45 [0.86–2.35] 0.149
FamRS 3 2.78 [1.49–5.09] 0.001 3.47 [1.79–6.35] 1.07 × 10–4

*ORs are given for FamRS categories “positive and strong positive family risk” (FamRS 2) and “very strong positive family risk” (FamRS 3) compared to average family risk.