Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 10;14:1150210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150210

Table 2.

Mixed-effects logistic regression model for condition-by-time effects on accuracy (fixed effects).

Accuracy
Predictors Odds ratios Confidence interval P
(Intercept) 2.17 1.23–3.83 0.008
Condition [1] 0.66 0.45–0.97 0.035
Condition [2] 0.74 0.52–1.04 0.085
Condition [3] 0.71 0.50–1.00 0.048
Timepoint 1.00 0.88–1.14 0.956
Relation type [Spatial] 1.09 1.03–1.15 0.002
Premises [2 Premise] 1.54 1.46–1.63 <0.001
Dimensions [1 Dimension] 1.41 1.37–1.45 <0.001
Solution [Indeterminate] 0.76 0.71–0.81 <0.001
Solution [True] 1.10 1.03–1.18 0.006
Age 1.00 0.99–1.01 0.806
Gender [Male] 1.14 0.96–1.36 0.128
Income bracket 1.07 1.03–1.12 0.002
Total education 1.08 0.93–1.26 0.299
Condition [1] * Timepoint 1.46 1.12–1.74 <0.001
Condition [2] * Timepoint 1.31 1.11–1.53 0.001
Condition [3] * Timepoint 1.35 1.11–1.59 <0.001
Random effects
σ2 3.29
τ00 ID 0.51
ICC 0.13
NID 301
Observations 27,563
Marginal R2/Conditional R2 0.046/0.173

Condition 1, adaptive practice; Condition 2, alphabetize spatial tool; Condition 3, mental models training. Condition 0 (no intervention) was the reference level in this model: The following variables were dummy coded. Relation Type: spatial vs. non-spatial; Premises: two premise vs. three premise; Dimensions: one-dimension relations vs. two-dimension relations; Solution: False vs. Indeterminate and False vs. True; Gender: 0, female; 1, male. Bold values indicate significant effects (p < 0.05).