Table 2.
Ref.
|
Country
|
Drug(s)
|
Number of patients
|
Study phase
|
ORR, %
|
Mean OS in mo
|
Mean PFS in mo
|
Results
|
Resectable CLM with no extra-hepatic metastasis | ||||||||
Gruenberger et al[42] | Austria | Capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab | 56 | 2 | 73.2 | - | - | Bevacizumab can be safely administered until 5 wk before liver resection in patients with metastatic CRC without increasing the rate of surgical or wound healing complications or the severity of bleeding |
Bridgewater et al[43] | United Kingdom | Oxaliplatin, L-folinic acid, fluorouracil or capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus cetuximab | 257 | 3 | - | 81.0/55.4 (Chemo/Chemo+) | 22.2/15.5 (Chemo/Chemo+) | In the perioperative setting, patients with operable diseases are at a disadvantage in terms of OS; hence, cetuximab should not be used in this setting |
Unresectable CLM with potential for resection and no extra-hepatic metastasis | ||||||||
Wong et al[44] | United Kingdom | Capecitabine, oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab | 46 | - | 78.0 | - | - | A high response rate for patients with CLMs with poor-risk features not selected for upfront resection and converted 40% of patients to resectability |
Gruenberger et al[45] | United Kingdom, Austria, France, and Spain | Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-6 (5-fluorouracil folinic acid oxaliplatin) or FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil folinic acid oxaliplatin irinotecan) | 80 | 2 | 81/62 (BF/BF6) | - | 18.6/11.5 (BF/BF6) | In patients with CLM that were originally unresectable, bevacizumab-FOLFOXIRI was correlated with better response and resection rates as well as a longer PFS than bevacizumab-mFOLFOX-6 |
Garufi et al[47] | Italy | Cetuximab plus chrono-IFLO (chrono-irinotecan 5-fluorouracil leucovorin oxaliplatin) | 43 | 2 | - | 37 | - | Cetuximab in combination with chrono-IFLO resulted in 60% full resectability of CLM patients |
Folprecht et al[48] | Germany | Cetuximab plus FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil folinic acid oxaliplatin) or FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil folinic acid oxaliplatin irinotecan) | 56/55 (CFX/CFI) | - | - | 35.7/29.0 (CFX/CFI) | 10.8/10.5 (CFX/CFI) | Both FOLFOX/FOLFIRI with cetuximab appear to be effective conversion therapy regimens in patients with KRAS codon 12/13/61 wild-type tumors. Thus, liver surgery can be deemed curative or as a second line of therapy in people who are not cured |
Unresectable CLM | ||||||||
Rivera et al[50] | Spain, Germany, United States, Belgium, Switzerland, and Italy | mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab or bevacizumab | 170/156 (RAS WT/RAS WT/BRAF WT) | - | RAS WT 65/60, RAS WT/BRAF WT 65/62 (FXP/FXB) | RAS WT 36.9/28.9, RAS WT/BRAF WT 46.3/28.9 (FXP/FXB) | RAS WT 12.8/10.1, RAS WT/BRAF WT 13.1/10.1 (FXP/FXB) | Panitumumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 is a successful first-line therapy for individuals with RAS WT and RAS WT/BRAF WT mCRC |
Stintzing et al[53] | Germany | FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil leucovorin irinotecan) plus cetuximab or bevacizumab | 400 | 3 | 65.3/58.7 (FIC/FIB) | 33.1/25.0 (FIC/FIB) | 10.3/10.2 (FIC/FIB) | In the first-line therapy of patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, FOLFIRI with cetuximab may be preferable than FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab |
Pfeiffer et al[58] | Denmark | Trifluridine plus tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) or TAS-102 plus bevacizumab | 47/46 (T/TB) | 2 | 51/67 (T/TB) | 6.7/9.4 (T/TB) | 2.6/4.6 (T/TB) | In terms of efficacy and safety, bevacizumab may be an effective companion for TAS-102 in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer |
Cremolini et al[59] | Italy | Cetuximab plus irinotecan | 13/12 (RWT/RMT) | 2 | - | 12.5/5.2 (RWT/RMT) | 4.0/1.9 (RWT/RMT) | In patients with RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC who have acquired resistance to first-line irinotecan and cetuximab-based treatment, a re-challenge approach with cetuximab and irinotecan may be effective. The examination of RAS mutational status on cDNA may aid in the selection of potential patients |
Sartore-Bianchi et al[60] | Italy | Panitumumab (re-challenge) | 25 | - | 30 | 13.7 | 4 | Interventional liquid biopsies can be used efficiently and safely to guide anti-EGFR re-challenge treatment with panitumumab in patients with mCRC |
Kopetz et al[63] | United States | Irinotecan cetuximab or irinotecan cetuximab plus vemurafenib | 50/50 (IC/ICV) | - | - | 12/12 (IC/ICV) | 2.0/4.2 (IC/ICV) | Vemurafenib in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan is an active combination that increases PFS. This is a well-planned research based on a solid grasp of the mechanisms of adaptive resistance in mCRC |
Tabernero et al[64] | United States, France, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Hong Kong, Norway, Switzerland, Japan, South Korea, and the Netherlands | Encorafenib cetuximab binimetinib or encorafenib cetuximab or FOLFIRI cetuximab | 224/220/221 (3D/2D/CD) | 3 | 26.8/19.5/1.8 (3D/2D/CD) | 9.3/9.3/5.9 (3D/2D/CD) | - | When compared to conventional chemotherapy, encorafenib plus cetuximab improved OS, ORR, and progression-free survival in previously treated patients with metastatic disease. Encorafenib with cetuximab is a new standard-of-care regimen for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E mCRC, according to main and revised studies |
Siena et al[68] | United States, Italy, United Kingdom, Spain, and Japan | Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) | 53/7/18 (A/B/C) | 2 | 45.3 (A) | 5.4 (A) | 6.9 (A) | Trastuzumab deruxtecan shown promising and sustained effect in HER2-positive mCRC that was resistant to conventional therapy, as well as a favorable safety profile |
Mayer et al[71] | Belgium, Italy, Japan, Spain, Australia, and United States | Trifluridine plus tipiracil hydrochloride (TAS-102) or placebo | 800 (2:1) | - | 1.6/0.4 (TAS/placebo) | 7.1/5.3 (TAS/placebo) | 2.0/1.7 (TAS/placebo) | A significant number of Japanese and Western patients with mCRC who had had a lot of prior treatment, including those whose condition was resistant to fluorouracil, were shown to respond clinically to TAS-102 |
2D: Encorafenib plus cetuximab; 3D: Encorafenib plus cetuximab plus binimetinib; A: Cohort A; B: Cohort B; BF: Bevacizumab plus FOLFOXIRI; BF6: Bevacizumab plus FOLFOX-6; BRAF: Protein kinase B-Raf; C: Cohort C; CD: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab; CFI: Cetuximab plus FOLFOXIRI; CFX: Cetuximab plus FOLFOX; CRC: Colorectal cancer; EGFR: Epidermal growth factor receptor; FIB: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab; FIC: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab; FOLFIRI: Folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan hydrochloride; FXB: mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab; FXP: mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab; HER2: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IC: Irinotecan plus cetuximab; ICV: Irinotecan plus cetuximab plus vemurafenib; mCRC: Metastatic colorectal cancer; ORR: Objective response rate; OS: Overall survival; PFS: Progression-free survival; RAS: Rat sarcoma virus; RMT: Rat sarcoma virus mutate-type; RWT: Rat sarcoma virus wild-type; T: Trifluridine plus tipiracil hydrochloride; TB: Trifluridine plus tipiracil hydrochloride plus bevacizumab; WT: Wild-type.