Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;23:62. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01953-4

Table 1.

Comparison of baseline data between the two groups

Baseline data Control group
(n = 405)
Study group
(n = 75)
X2 P
Age (%) 5.334 0.021
< 60 128(31.6) 34(45.3)
≥ 60 277(68.4) 41(54.7)
Sex (%) 13.516 <0.001
Male 254(62.7) 30(40.0)
Female 151(37.3) 45(60.0)
History of pancreatitis (%) 23.069 <0.001
No 373(92.1) 55(73.3)
Yes 32(7.9) 20(26.7)
History of diabetes (%) 0.889 0.346
No 321(79.3) 63(84.0)
Yes 84(20.7) 12(16.0)
History of hypertension (%) 0.026 0.872
No 277(68.4) 52(69.3)
Yes 128(31.6) 23(30.7)
History of ERCP (%) 1.504 0.220
No 285(70.4) 58(77.3)
Yes 120(29.6) 17(22.7)
Indication for ERCP (%)
Choledocholithiasis 203(50.1) 46(61.3) 3.185 0.074
biliary stricture 0(0) 1(1.3) - 0.156
pancreatitis 39(9.6) 12(16.0) 2.704 0.100
cholangeitis 216(53.3) 45(60.0) 1.134 0.287
Others 110(27.2) 17(22.7) 0.657 0.418
History of cholecystectomy (%) 0.558 0.455
No 358(88.4) 64(85.3)
Yes 47(11.6) 11(14.7)
History of choledocholithiasis (%) 5.612 0.018
No 288(71.1) 43(57.3)
Yes 117(28.9) 32(42.7)
Total bilirubin 78.93 ± 95.77 65.85 ± 92.76 1.091 0.276
Triglyceride 1.52 ± 0.85 1.45 ± 0.68 0.751 0.453

Count data are expressed as n (%), and measurement data as mean ± SD. ERCP, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; study group, patients developed pancreatitis after ERCP; control group, patients did not develop pancreatitis after ERCP.