Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 24;15:62. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01212-x

Table 2.

Validation results of immunoassays for VAMP2 and SNAP25

Parameter Acceptance criteria VAMP2 ELISA SNAP25 Simoa
Sensitivity – LLOQ Conc Meanblank + 10*SDblank 127 pg/ml 2.91 pg/ml
Precision CV < 15% Conc Intra-assay Inter-assay Conc Intra-assay Inter-assay
 Low sample 235 6.3% 6.3% 4 8.3% 10.6%
 Medium sample 299 2.6% 4.5% 6 14.3% 14.3%
 High sample 748 3.5% 3.5% 10 7.9% 7.9%
Mean 4.1% 4.8% Mean 10.2% 10.9%
Dilutional linearity 80–120% linearity Mean 3 samples Mean 3 samples
DF (x) %L DF (x) %L
1 - 1 -
2 155 3 108
4 107 6 112
8 106 16 115
16 107 39 99
32 97 98 97
64 143
Mean 110% Mean 106%
Parallelism 80–120% in range with the slope of the calibrator Mean 3 samples Mean 5 samples
Mean SD Mean SD
R2 0.94 0.0263 0.98 0.005
 Slope 1.54 0.109 1.41 0.071
 Range 103% 7% 89% 4%

Partial validation of the immunoassays: novel VAMP2 ELISA and SNAP25 Simoa. All concentration values are in pg/mL. The table shows the LLOQ of the immunoassays; precision for 3 different CSF samples with low, medium, and high analyte concentrations as the mean %CV of samples intra-assay and inter-assay; the mean dilutional linearity for 3 CSF samples against their dilution factors; and the mean %parallelism with the calibrator for 5 CSF samples (SD, standard deviation; R2, linear regression coefficient). VAMP2 ELISA: The mean intra- and inter-assay precision was 4.1% and 4.8% respectively, while the mean dilutional linearity was 110%. The mean parallelism on CSF samples was 103%. SNAP25 Simoa: The mean intra- and inter-assay precision was 10.2% and 10.9% respectively, while the mean dilutional linearity was 106%. The mean parallelism on CSF samples was 89%