Table II.
Glycemic Control | ||
---|---|---|
Suboptimal | Poor | |
Characteristic | Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | Odds Ratio(95% Confidence Interval) |
Main variables | ||
Hours worked during previous week | ||
1–20 hours | 1.00 | 1.00 |
21–40 hours | 1.92 (0.72– 5.15) | 1.37 (0.30– 6.36) |
41+ hours | 5.09a (1.38–18.76) | 2.05 (0.39–10.72) |
Occupation | ||
White collar | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Service | 1.18 (0.50– 2.76) | 0.85 (0.27–2.69) |
Agricultural worker | 27.6a (1.85– 412.50) | 8.02 (0.78–82.21) |
Blue Collar | 0.77 (0.36–1.64) | 1.15 (0.41–3.27) |
Covariates | ||
Sex | ||
Male | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Female | 0.94 (0.36–2.45) | 0.70 (0.32–1.53) |
Age group (years) | ||
20–44 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
45–64 | 0.90 (0.39– 2.10) | 0.65 (0.29–1.48) |
65+ | 0.98 (0.38–2.52) | 0.12a (0.02– 0.93) |
Race/Ethnicity | ||
Non-Hispanic White | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Non-Hispanic Black | 3.43a (1.51–7.81) | 3.08a (1.18–8.03) |
Hispanic | 2.11 (0.92– 4.84) | 1.83 (0.61–5.54) |
Other | 4.23 (0.91–19.69) | 1.52 (0.44–5.25) |
Education | ||
Less than high school | 1.00 | 1.00 |
High school graduate | 0.53 (0.20–1.40) | 0.98 (0.33–2.92) |
More than high school | 0.60 (0.28–1.30) | 0.65 (0.27–1.57) |
Have insurance | ||
No | 1.00 | |
Yes | 0.87 (0.35– 2.12) | 0.37a (0.15–0.91) |
Taking insulin | ||
No | 1.00 | |
Yes | 3.98a (1.44–11.00) | 2.79a (1.11–7.00) |
BMI category | ||
Under/normal weight | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Overweight | 0.48 (0.16–1.47) | 0.81 (0.28–2.30) |
Obese | 0.80 (0.35–1.82) | 0.45 (0.17–1.24) |
Hypertension diagnosis b | ||
No | 1.00 | --- |
Yes | 0.90 (0.49–1.64) | ---- |
History of cardiovascular disease c | ||
No | --- | 1.00 |
Yes | --- | 0.30 (0.07–1.26) |
Variables statistically significant at the 5% alpha level;
Hypertension diagnosis was not statistically associated with poor glycemic control in univariate analyses at the 20% alpha level and therefore was not included in the adjusted logistic regression model;
History of CVD was not statistically associated with suboptimal or borderline glycemic control in univariate analyses at the20% alpha level and therefore was not included in the adjusted logistic regression model