Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 28;248:157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.12.026

Table 4:

Longitudinal Analyses and Least Square Means and Pairwise Comparisons of 3 Groups Defined by Treatment Patterns for Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Post-baseline Outcomes

Outcome 1. Treated Continuously 2. Discontinued Treatment Early 3. Treated Intermittently P-value 1 vs 2 P-value 1 vs 3 P-value 2 vs 3
LS Mean Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI LS Mean Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI LS Mean Lower 95% CL Upper 95% CL
VALS 68.6 65.8 71.4 73.2 67.8 78.6 67.4 63.4 71.5 0.14 0.65 0.10
Change from baseline in VALS 18.6 15.6 21.5 23.4 17.7 29.1 17.2 13.0 21.5 0.14 0.61 0.09
CST 300 285 315 257 227 287 303 281 325 0.01 0.81 0.02
Change from baseline in CST −397 −415 −380 −443 −477 −409 −394 −419 −369 0.02 0.81 0.02

Abbreviations: LS=Least Square; CL=Confidence Limits; VALS-Visual Acuity Letter Score; CST=Central Subfield Thickness.