Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;28:6. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_410_22

Table 2.

Quality of family-center collaborative care studies

Kind of article Critical appraisal tool Score Quality
RCT Verhagen 2/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 5/9 Moderate
Mixed methods MMAT 4/5 Moderate
Mixed methods MMAT 3/5 Moderate
Qualitative study CASP 7/10 Moderate
Quasi experimental JBI 8/9 Good
RCT Verhagen 6/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 2/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 5/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 7/9 Good
RCT Verhagen 4/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 5/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 6/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 6/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 3/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 2/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 4/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 4/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 6/9 Moderate
RCT Verhagen 7/9 Good
Mixed methods MMAT 3/5 Moderate
Qualitative study CASP 9/10 Good
Qualitative study CASP 9/10 Good
Qualitative study CASP 9/10 Good
mixed methods pilot study MMAT 4/5 Good
RCT Verhagen 3/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 2/9 Poor
RCT Verhagen 5/9 Moderate

RCT: Randomized-controlled trial, MMAT: Mixed methods appraisal tool, CASP: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, JBI: The Joanna Briggs Institute