Table 1.

Comparison of our FARNet with prior state-of-the-art methods on the cephalometric X-ray dataset with 19 annotated landmarks

		Test1 data					Test2 data
Methods	Input size	MRE	2mm	2.5mm	3mm	4mm	MRE	2mm	2.5mm	3mm	4mm
Ibragimov et al. [20]	-	1.84	71.70	77.40	81.90	88.00	-	62.74	70.47	76.53	85.11
Lindner et al. [25]	-	1.67	74.95	80.28	84.56	89.68	1.92	66.11	72.00	77.63	87.42
Arik et al. [31]	$800\times 640$	-	75.37	80.91	84.32	88.25	-	67.68	74.16	79.11	84.63
Qian et al. [44]	-	-	82.50	86.20	89.30	92.60	-	72.40	76.15	79.65	85.90
Oh et al. [43]	$800\times 640$	1.18	86.20	91.20	94.40	97.70	1.44	75.89	83.36	89.26	95.73
Chen et al. [42]	$800\times 640$	1.17	86.67	92.67	95.54	98.53	1.48	75.05	82.84	88.53	95.05
Zhong et al. [38]	$968\times 968$	1.12	86.91	91.82	94.88	97.90	1.42	76.00	82.90	88.74	94.32
FARNet(Our)	$800\times 640$	1.12	88.03	92.73	95.96	98.48	1.42	77.00	84.42	89.47	95.21

The bold value in each column represents the best result