Table 1. Conditional logistic regression investigating burrow-site selection by eastern chipmunks, based on environmental variables within a 10 m radius plot around paired burrows and control points.
Effect | Estimate | SE | |z| | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Canopy cover (%) | 0.057 | 0.045 | 1.28 | 0.20 |
Herbaceous plants and shrubs (<1 m) cover (%) | 0.010 | 0.021 | 0.48 | 0.63 |
Rocks cover (%) | −0.086 | 0.058 | 1.49 | 0.14 |
Woody debris cover (%) | −0.068 | 0.057 | 1.20 | 0.23 |
Number of logs (>2 m) | 0.258 | 0.137 | 1.89 | 0.059 |
Number of refuges | 0.062 | 0.083 | 0.74 | 0.46 |
Slope (°) | 0.256 | 0.073 | 3.51 | <0.001 |
Horizontal openness | 0.396 | 0.350 | 1.13 | 0.26 |
Canopy height 1 | 4.771 | 4.891 | 0.98 | 0.33 |
Canopy height 2 | 4.171 | 4.961 | 0.84 | 0.40 |
Canopy height 3 | 3.080 | 4.676 | 0.66 | 0.51 |
Canopy height 4 | 3.296 | 4.915 | 0.67 | 0.50 |
Small hardwood tree density | −0.019 | 0.013 | 1.50 | 0.13 |
Average DBH of large seed-producing trees | 0.166 | 0.117 | 1.42 | 0.16 |
Large beech tree density | −0.104 | 0.109 | 0.95 | 0.34 |
Large sugar maple tree density | −0.101 | 0.091 | 1.11 | 0.27 |
Large red maple tree density | 0.119 | 0.257 | 0.46 | 0.64 |
Yellow trout lily cover (%) | −0.047 | 0.049 | 0.95 | 0.34 |
Carolina spring beauty cover (%) | −0.296 | 0.201 | 1.47 | 0.14 |
Notes:
The table presents all variables included in the full model, with their beta-coefficient, SE, z and P values. Canopy height 0 = low (reference level). Canopy height 1 = Mix of low and medium. Canopy height 2 = Medium. Canopy height 3 = Mix of medium and high. Canopy height 4 = High. Small trees have a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≤10 cm, while large trees have a DBH >31 cm. Seed-producing trees include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum) and sugar maple (A. saccharum).
Analysis included 102 plots that were identified as a burrow-site at least once since 2012 and 102 control plots. Significant variables (α = 0.05) are in bold.