Sperber 1989.
| Methods | Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, experimental colds | |
| Participants | 40 inoculated, 31 colds, mean age 21 years, 39.1% women, setting not reported, fever ≤ 37.7 °C | |
| Interventions | Ibuprofen 200 mg, 2 doses for the first day and 4 doses for the subsequent 4 days | |
| Outcomes | 4‐point scale. Moderate to marked severity (2‐ to 3‐point) was reduced in the ibuprofen group (18% versus 29%) but statistical significance was not reported | |
| Notes | Adverse effects were slightly more frequent in the ibuprofen group (6/23) than in the control group (4/23) | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | "... were randomly assigned to receive" Comment: insufficient information about the sequence generation process |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: insufficient information about the allocation concealment |
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "... two identically appearing capsules" Comment: probably done |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Among 58 inoculated participants, 8 were excluded (7 not infected, 1 infected with wild type virus), 1 was withdrawn |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol, no convincing text |
| Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |