Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 25;14(9):805–814. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14811

TABLE 3.

Treatment outcomes

Treatment outcome Overall N = 63 ECOG‐PS 2 N = 38 ECOG‐PS ≥3 N = 25 p value
Best response, n (%) 0.558
Complete response 0 0 0
Partial response 45 (71.4) 27 (71.1) 18 (72.0)
Stable disease 8 (12.7) 6 (15.8) 2 (8.0)
Progressive disease 10 (15.9) 5 (13.2) 5 (20.0)
ORR (%) 71.4% 71.1% 72.0%
Median PFS, months (95% CI) 4.4 (3.6–5.2) 4.6 (3.8–5.6) 3.1 (1.9–4.7) 0.946
Median OS, months (95% CI) 6.5 (5.6–8.1) 7.7 (5.8–9.7) 5.1 (3.6–6.5) 0.421
Improvement to PS 1 or less after treatment of one cycle of CE, n (%) 0.234
Yes 36 (57.1) 24 (63.2) 12 (48.0)
No a 27 (42.9) 14 (36.8) 13 (52.0)
Toxicity during first cycle of CE, n (%)
Neutropenia of grade 3 or higher 40 (63.5) 22 (57.9) 18 (72.0) 0.255
FN 13 (20.6) 6 (15.8) 7 (28.0) 0.241
Treatment‐related deaths associated with CE b , n (%) 4 (6.3) 2 (5.3) 2 (8.0) 0.663
Modification of dosing plan due to side effects, n (%) 24 (38.1) 11 (28.9) 13 (52.0) 0.065
Dose reduction 14 (22.2) 8 (21.1) 6 (24.0)
Discontinuation of administration c 10 (15.9) 3 (7.9) 7 (28.0)

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CE, carboplatin plus etoposide; ECOG‐PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groups Performance Status; FN, febrile neutropenia; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

a

Including two deaths during one cycle of CE in the PS 2 group.

b

The causes of TRD were FN in two cases, aspiration in one case, and gastrointestinal bleeding in one case.

c

Including four treatment‐related death cases during CE therapy.