Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 25;53(2):67–76. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.076

Table 4.

ANOVA of the mandibular condylar height and width in different sagittal skeletal patterns

Variables ANB groups Mean SD p-value Mean difference p-value
LCW Class I 18.85 2.36 0.454 Class I Class II 0.18 0.942
Class II 18.66 2.71 Class III –0.46 0.683
Class III 19.32 2.48 Class II Class I –0.18 0.942
Class III –0.65 0.476
LCH Class I 18.49 3.17 0.000*** Class I Class II 0.84 0.438
Class II 17.65 3.07 Class III –1.92 0.015
Class III 20.41 3.05 Class II Class I –0.84 0.438
Class III –2.76 0.000***
RCW Class I 18.84 2.20 0.510 Class I Class II 0.14 0.963
Class II 18.70 2.64 Class III –0.42 0.703
Class III 19.27 2.38 Class II Class I –0.14 0.963
Class III –0.56 0.538
RCH ClassI 18.74 2.72 0.000*** Class I Class II 1.15 0.168
Class II 17.58 3.11 Class III –1.58 0.037
Class III 20.32 2.81 Class II Class I –1.15 0.168
Class III –2.74 0.000***

ANOVA, analysis of variance; ANB, A point-nasion-B point; SD, standard deviation; LCW, left condylar width; LCH, left condylar height; RCW, right condylar width; RCH, right condylar height.

***p < 0.001.

ANOVA test was performed.

Scheff's post hoc test was performed.