Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 25;53(2):67–76. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.076

Table 5.

ANOVA of the mandibular condylar height and width in different vertical skeletal patterns

Variables SN-MP groups Mean SD p-value Mean difference p-value
LCW Hypodivergent 19.25 2.03 0.553 Hypodivergent Normodivergent 0.28 0.861
Normodivergent 18.96 2.51 Hyperdivergent 0.66 0.555
Hyperdivergent 18.59 2.98 Normodivergent Hypodivergent –0.28 0.861
Hyperdivergent 0.37 0.784
LCH Hypodivergent 18.87 3.23 0.986 Hypodivergent Normodivergent 0.06 0.995
Normodivergent 18.80 3.29 Hyperdivergent –0.04 0.998
Hyperdivergent 18.92 3.44 Normodivergent Hypodivergent –0.06 0.995
Hyperdivergent –0.11 0.987
RCW Hypodivergent 19.31 2.01 0.276 Hypodivergent Normodivergent 0.30 0.837
Normodivergent 19.01 2.45 Hyperdivergent 0.91 0.295
Hyperdivergent 18.40 2.67 Normodivergent Hypodivergent –0.30 0.837
Hyperdivergent 0.60 0.489
RCH Hypodivergent 18.87 2.88 0.999 Hypodivergent Normodivergent –0.01 1.000
Normodivergent 18.89 2.90 Hyperdivergent –0.01 1.000
Hyperdivergent 18.88 3.65 Normodivergent Hypodivergent 0.01 1.000
Hyperdivergent 0.00 1.000

ANOVA, analysis of variance; SN, sella-nasion plane; MP, mandibular plane; SD, standard deviation; LCW, left condylar width; LCH, left condylar height; RCW, right condylar width; RCH, right condylar height.

ANOVA test was performed.

Scheff's post hoc test was performed.