Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 25;53(2):67–76. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.076

Table 6.

ANOVA of the mandibular condyle height and width in different age groups

Variables SN-MP groups Mean SD p-value Mean difference p-value
LCW Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 18.31 2.28 0.233 Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr –0.88 0.238
21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr 19.2 2.38 Group 3 ≥ 30 yr –0.72 0.550
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 19.04 3.13 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 0.88 0.238
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 0.15 0.963
LCH Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 18.57 3 0.844 Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr –0.39 0.844
21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr 18.97 3.21 Group 3 ≥ 30 yr –0.3 0.942
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 18.87 3.95 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 0.39 0.844
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 0.09 0.991
RCW Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 18.14 2.07 0.084 Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr –1.06 0.099
21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr 19.21 2.32 Group 3 ≥ 30 yr –1.04 0.257
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 19.18 2.9 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 1.06 0.099
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 0.02 0.990
RCH Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 18.44 3.04 0.501 Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr –0.46 0.767
21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr 18.91 2.96 Group 3 ≥ 30 yr –0.95 0.504
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr 19.4 3.48 21 yr ≤ Group 2 < 30 yr Group 1 ≤ 20 yr 0.46 0.767
Group 3 ≥ 30 yr –0.49 0.789

ANOVA, analysis of variance; SN, sella-nasion plane; MP, mandibular plane; SD, standard deviation; LCW, left condylar width; LCH, left condylar height; RCW, right condylar width; RCH, right condylar height.

ANOVA test was performed.

Scheff's post hoc test was performed.