Table 4.
SNR and CNR calculations
Kernel | Position | Dose protocol | PCD-CT (mean ± SEM) | EID-CT (mean ± SEM) | p value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNR | Br76/Ur77 | OH | 2 mGy | 0.6 ± 0.11 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | < 0.001 |
6 mGy | 0.7 ± 0.11 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.7 ± 0.11 | 0.6 ± 0.15 | 0.001 | |||
ABD | 2 mGy | 0.5 ± 0.16 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | < 0.001 | ||
6 mGy | 0.7 ± 0.16 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.7 ± 0.17 | 0.4 ± 0.07 | < 0.001 | |||
Br89/Ur89 | OH | 2 mGy | 0.3 ± 0.07 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.031 | |
6 mGy | 0.4 ± 0.09 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.4 ± 0.12 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | < 0.001 | |||
ABD | 2 mGy | 0.3 ± 0.58 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | < 0.001 | ||
6 mGy | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.235 | |||
12 mGy | 0.3 ± 0.11 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.774 | |||
CNR | Br76/Ur77 | OH | 2 mGy | 0.9 ± 0.16 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 |
6 mGy | 1.0 ± 0.14 | 0.6 ± 0.05 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 1.0 ± 0.15 | 1.0 ± 0.12 | 0.013 | |||
ABD | 2 mGy | 0.5 ± 0.32 | 0.4 ± 0.10 | < 0.001 | ||
6 mGy | 0.9 ± 0.20 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.9 ± 0.21 | 0.5 ± 0.06 | < 0.001 | |||
Br89/Ur89 | OH | 2 mGy | 0.4 ± 0.11 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.031 | |
6 mGy | 0.6 ± 0.13 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.7 ± 0.18 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | |||
ABD | 2 mGy | 0.4 ± 0.71 | 0.4 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 | ||
6 mGy | 0.4 ± 0.11 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | < 0.001 | |||
12 mGy | 0.5 ± 0.13 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.011 |
Calculations of SNR and CNR after a ROI-based measurement of signal attenuation for different dose protocols, arm scanning positions and reconstruction kernels. The results are given as mean values with the standard error of mean (± SEM). The p value of the Mann-Whitney U test analysis is reported. ABD Abdominal scanning position, CNR Contrast-to-noise ratio, EID-CT Energy-integrating detector computed tomography, OH Overhead scanning position, PCD-CT Photon-counting detector computed tomography, ROI Region of interest, SNR Signal-to-noise ratio