Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 13;23(4):484–495. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00735-6

Table 2:

Rates of Clinical Improvement

Timepoint Analysis
Population
Treatment Group Rate of Clinical
Improvement,
n [%, (95% CI)]
Difference in
Rates, %
(95% CI)
Non-
inferior1
Day 5
ITT-5 Azithromycin (N=249) 155 [69, (61, 77)] −6 (−15,2) No
Placebo (N=250) 148 [63, (54, 71)]
ATP-5 Azithromycin (N=204) 136 [70, (62, 79)] −5 (−14,4) No
Placebo (N=221) 136 [65, (57, 74)]
Day 11
ITT-11 Azithromycin (N=249) 187 [81, (74, 87)] −4 (−12,3) Yes
Placebo (N=250) 184 [76, (70, 83)]
ATP-11 Azithromycin (N=211) 174 [80, (73, 87)] −4 (−11,4) Yes
Placebo (N=225) 177 [77, (70, 83)]
Day 28
ITT-28 Azithromycin (N=249) 202 [88, (83, 93)] −7 (−13,0) No
Placebo (N=250) 194 [82, (77, 86)]
ATP-28 Azithromycin (N=210) 185 [88, (83, 93)] −6 (−12,1) Yes
Placebo (N=223) 184 [82, (77, 87)]

ITT = Intention to treat. ATP = According to protocol. n = Number of subjects with clinical improvement.

1

Non-inferiority of placebo is concluded if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference in proportions is greater in below −12·5%.