Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 21;45:101198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101198

Table 1.

Comparison between HCM subjects and controls.

HCM subjects
(n = 30)
Controls
(n = 10)
p
Men 20 (67%) 5 (50%) 0.35
Age, years 61 ± 12 56 ± 13 0.30
Body mass index 29.3 ± 4.9 25.3 ± 3.6 0.052
Height, cm 168 ± 10 167 ± 11 0.84
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 136 ± 15 133 ± 18 0.56
Von Willebrand factor rag 152 ± 63 134 ± 35 0.96
Abnormal flow mediated dilatation (value < 7%) 20 (67%) 4 (40%) 0.14
Abnormal venous filling index (value > 2) 5 (17%) 1 (10%) 0.61
Abnormal venous residual volume fraction (value > 35%) 9 (30%) 0 (0%) 0.049
Venous ejection fraction, % 59 ± 15 63 ± 19 0.68

Data are expressed in mean ± SD or n (%), HCM = hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.