Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 5;387(2):132–147. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204925

Table 2.

Response to Treatment.*

Variable RVD-Alone Group (N = 357) Transplantation Group (N = 365) Hazard Ratio (95% CI) Adjusted P Value
Best response
 Partial response or better 0.55
  No. with response 339 356
  Percentage with response (95% CI) 95.0 (91.0–97.5) 97.5 (94.5–99.2)
 Very good partial response or better 0.99
  No. with response 284 302
  Percentage with response (95% CI) 79.6 (73.3–85.0) 82.7 (76.8–87.7)
 Complete response or better 0.99
  No. with response 150 171
  Percentage with response (95% CI) 42.0 (35.0–49.3) 46.8 (39.8–54.0)
 Stringent complete response — no. (%) 99 (27.7) 120 (32.9)
 Complete response — no. (%) 51 (14.3) 51 (14.0)
Very good partial response — no. (%) 134 (37.5) 131 (35.9)
Partial response — no. (%) 55 (15.4) 54 (14.8)
Stable disease — no. (%) 15 (4.2) 7 (1.9)
Progressive disease — no. (%) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
Not evaluable — no. (%) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3)
Duration of response
 Median duration of partial response or better — mo 38.9 56.4
 Disease progression events — no./total no. (%) 194/339 (57.2) 164/356 (46.1) 1.45 (1.09–1.93) 0.003
 Complete response or better at 5 yr — % 52.9 60.6
 Disease progression events — no./total no. (%) 61/150 (40.7) 57/171 (33.3) 1.35 (0.83–2.22) 0.70
*

Responses were assessed according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria by a central response review committee.

P values were adjusted with the use of Bonferroni’s correction to control the overall family‑wise error rate for secondary outcomes.

This P value was calculated with the use of Fisher’s exact test.