TABLE 3.

Network metrics summarized in two empirical systems with direct and indirect interaction weights combined.

FL wild pig	observed	downsampled CTMM	1 min CTMM
Modularity	0.22	0.20	0.21
transitivity	0.69	0.74	0.74
Edge density	0.28	0.46	0.46
Outdegree	NB (5.94,5.40), x = [0,10]	NB (x, mean = 11.58, var = 24.95), x = [0,14]	NB (x, mean = 11.58, var = 24.95), x = [0,14]
Indegree	NB (4.23,5.40), x = [0,10]	NB (x, mean = 7.26, var = 13.90), x = [0,14]	NB (x, mean = 7.26, var = 13.90), x = [0,14]
Outstrength	Exp (x, λ = 0.006), x = [0,528.69]	Exp (x, λ = 0.012), x = 0, 251.62]	Exp (x, λ = 5.86 e−5), x = [0, 58735.53]
Instrength	Exp (x, λ = 0.006), x = [0,543.01]	Exp (x, λ = 0.012), x = 0, 243.63]	Exp (x, λ = 5.86 e−5), x = [0, 59839.9]

CO Mule Deer
Modularity	−0.004	−0.02	0.02
transitivity	0.78	0.88	0.88
Edge density	0.59	0.73	0.73
Outdegree	NB (x, mean = 26.91 var = 42.31), x = [10,38]	NB (x, mean = 33.38, var = 56.84), x = [15,43]	NB (x, mean = 33.38, var = 56.84), x = [15,43]
Indegree	NB (x, mean = 26.91 var = 42.31), x = [2,42]	NB (x, mean = 33.38, var = 57.85), x = [2,46]	NB (x, mean = 33.38, var = 57.85), x = [2,46]
Outstrength	Exp (x, λ = 0.009), x = [1.95, 496.03]	Exp (x, λ = 0.001), x = [0.89, 2954.89]	Exp (x, λ = 1.30 e−5), x = [71.98, 308836.80]
Instrength	Exp (x, λ = 0.009), x = [0.04, 559.50]	Exp (x, λ = 0.001), x = [27.22, 6149.5]	Exp (x, λ = 1.30 e−5), x = [2478.73, 239829.48]