Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2023 Jan 12;35(4):353–365. doi: 10.1037/pas0001202

Table 3:

Model fit statistics from tests for invariance of age-specific GNG/CPT task versions

Model χ2 df RMSEA CFI TLI SRMR Δχ 2 Δdf ΔRMSEA ΔCFI ΔTLI ΔSRMR Decision (accept or reject invariance)
Configural 47.92 39 .036 .995 .995 .028 - - - - Accept
 Version 1 16.32 13 .044 .995 .989 .024 - - - - -
 Version 2 18.88 13 .058 .979 .954 .036 - - - - -
 Version 3 12.72 13 0 1 1 .020 - - - - -
Full metric 69.82*** 51 .049 .988 .981 .089 21.90* 12 .010 .007 .007 .061 Reject
Partial metric 66.16** 50 .046 .990 .981 .077 18.24 11 .007 .005 .005 .049 Accept
Full scalar 121.31* 63 .079 .964 .952 .131 73.39*** 24 .040 .010 .036 .089 Reject
Partial scalar 76.76* 59 .045 .989 .984 .074 29.27 20 .006 .006 .004 .046 Accept
Full strict 204.58*** 72 .111 .919 .905 .201 212.47** 33 .072 .108 .069 .173 Reject
Partial strict 87.26 67 .045 .988 .984 .112 39.82 28 .006 .006 .004 .082 Accept
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .00