Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 27.
Published before final editing as: Curr Mol Med. 2016 Apr 29.

Table 1.

Major advantages and disadvantages of GMB diagnosis and treatment modalities.

GBM Diagnosis Techniques
Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Molecular
Markers
  • Some molecular markers are useful to predict the response to chemotherapy.

  • In the future more specific and reliable molecular markers could be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers and/or as targets for therapy (personalized medicine).

  • Currently, there are no molecular markers for GBM diagnosis.

  • Molecular markers are measured only in a tumor biopsy.

  • Expression levels of a specific molecular marker may vary between two GBM patients or with tumor progression.

Non-Invasive
Brain Imaging
Diagnosis
  • Provides images and maps (including 3D images) of the brain in a non-invasive manner.

  • Allows for more accurate GBM diagnoses.

  • Some techniques may increase cancer risk (as a result of radiation).

  • The intravenous injection of exogenous agents -needed for imaging- can trigger unwanted side effects.

  • Most of the equipments are very expensive.

Tumor Biopsy Histologic analysis of the tumor remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of GBM and other tumor types.
  • Tumor heterogeneity, non-specific morphologic features, and tumor sampling may reduce the diagnosis value.

  • Sometimes, the histological analysis is not conclusive and the procedure must be repeated.

  • All types of brain biopsies may result in swelling or bleeding on the brain.

GBM Treatment and Post-treatment Techniques
Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Tumor
Resection
  • Extent resection of GBMs increases OS and PFS.

  • Craniotomy and debulking offers a modest survival advantage over biopsy.

  • The use of 5-ALA enables more tumor resection and increases PFS.

  • Invasive.

  • Surgical and Anesthesia risks involved.

  • May increase OS and PFS with a tax in quality of life.

Chemotherapy
  • Temozolomide (Temodar) in combination with radiotherapy is the gold standard for GBM treatment.

  • Several drugs to target specific cell survival pathways I cancer cells are under investigation and/or in clinical trials.

  • Most chemotherapeutic agents affect also normal cells and cause side effects.

  • Most chemotherapeutic drugs do not cross the BBB.

  • Most patients become resistant to chemotherapy.

  • Inefficacious when GBM is in advanced stages (highly infiltrated).

Radiotherapy
  • Non invasive high field energy that kills cancer cells.

  • The technology has improved in such a way that it allows the radiation beam to focus better at the tumor tissue and decrease damage to surrounding non-neoplastic areas.

  • Affects normal brain tissue and significantly lower in efficacy if used without Temodar concomitantly.

  • Induce other side effects: hair loss, sickness, tiredness, worsening of the brain tumor symptoms.

Intraoperative
Radiotherapy
Delivers more specifically a dose of radiation to the tumor bed intraoperatively.
  • Involves a craniotomy, debulking of tumor and the surgical risks that are involved.

  • Not available everywhere.

Electric Fields
  • Tumor Treatment Fields affect rapidly dividing tumor cells.

  • OS comparable to current Chemotherapy and XRT.

  • Battery dependent hardware and multiple components to the system.

  • Not indicated for newly diagnosed GBM patients.

Post-treatment
Imaging
  • Non invasive follow up on tumor progression and staging of disease.

  • Confounding factors of pseudoprogression and radionecrosis.

  • Require specialized techniques and expensive equipment.