Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Mar 15;17(3):e0011161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011161

Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers and probability of occurrence of severe dengue: A multicenter hospital-based study in Bangladesh

Jingli Yang 1,2, Abdullah Al Mosabbir 3, Enayetur Raheem 3, Wenbiao Hu 1,*, Mohammad Sorowar Hossain 3,4,*
Editor: Marc Choisy5
PMCID: PMC10042364  PMID: 36921001

Abstract

Establishing reliable early warning models for severe dengue cases is a high priority to facilitate triage in dengue-endemic areas and optimal use of limited resources. However, few studies have identified the complex interactive relationship between potential risk factors and severe dengue. This research aimed to assess the potential risk factors and detect their high-order combinative effects on severe dengue. A structured questionnaire was used to collect detailed dengue outbreak data from eight representative hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, in 2019. Logistic regression and machine learning models were used to examine the complex effects of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers on severe dengue. A total of 1,090 dengue cases (158 severe and 932 non-severe) were included in this study. Dyspnoea (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.87, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.72 to 4.77), plasma leakage (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.12 to 6.15), and hemorrhage (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.46 to 3.73) were positively and significantly associated with the occurrence of severe dengue. Classification and regression tree models showed that the probability of occurrence of severe dengue cases ranged from 7% (age >12.5 years without plasma leakage) to 92.9% (age ≤12.5 years with dyspnoea and plasma leakage). The random forest model indicated that age was the most important factor in predicting severe dengue, followed by education, plasma leakage, platelet, and dyspnoea. The research provides new evidence to identify key risk factors contributing to severe dengue cases, which could be beneficial to clinical doctors to identify and predict the severity of dengue early.

Author summary

Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral infection mostly in warm and tropical regions, which has been listed as one of the top ten global health threats by the WHO. Among neglected tropical diseases, the mortality of dengue is on the rise. Severe dengue (typically manifested by bleeding, organ dysfunction, and plasma leakage) has become a leading cause of hospitalization for children and adults. There is a higher risk of death if severe dengue cases are not appropriately managed. Therefore, finding biomarkers that can reliably predict the development of severe dengue in symptomatic individuals is one of the main focuses of current research efforts. We found that dyspnoea, plasma leakage, and hemorrhage were the independent risk factors of severe dengue. The predictive probability of occurrence of severe dengue achieved 92.9% among people aged ≤ 12.5 years with dyspnoea and plasma leakage. Establishing an early warning system for severe dengue based on these factors is essential for triaging in endemic areas. The findings of this study identified possible combinations of severe dengue, which would provide enhanced insight into clinical management and inform prevention programming for severe dengue.

Introduction

Dengue, a global public health concern, is a mosquito-borne viral infection mostly in warm and tropical regions [1]. Dengue is transmitted through a human-mosquito-human cycle, with Aedes aegypti as the primary vector and followed by Aedes albopictus [2]. Dengue cases reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) have increased 10-fold during the past 20 years, from 0.5 million cases in 2000 to 2.4 million cases in 2010 and 5.2 million cases in 2019 [3]. Dengue is the only neglected tropical disease whose mortality rose from 1990 to 2019 [4], which is likely due to the interaction of climate change [5], traffic [6], population density [7], extreme poverty, and inadequate sanitation [8]. Dengue has been listed as one of the top ten global health threats by the WHO in 2019, which was confirmed by recent outbreaks in many countries [1], such as the 2019 dengue outbreak in Bangladesh [9]. Salje estimated that about a quarter of Bangladesh’s population (about 40 million) was infected with dengue, with an average of 2.4 million infections per year [10]. In severe dengue, which may cause bleeding, organ dysfunction, and plasma leakage, there is a higher risk of death if it is not treated correctly, which has become a leading cause of hospitalization and death for children and adults [3]. As reported by Stanaway, dengue caused about 1.14 million disability-adjusted life-years in 2013 [11].

There is no specific antiviral therapy for dengue infection, but the symptoms can be managed [1]. According to the WHO, coordinated processes for early detection, classifying, treating, and referring severe dengue lower mortality to less than 1% [3]. Vector control is the main strategy for dengue control [12], but recent studies show that existing control measures have achieved little in curbing the rising incidence of dengue infection globally [13]. Finding biomarkers that can reliably predict the development of severe dengue in symptomatic individuals is one of the main focuses of current research efforts [6]. During the transition from the febrile period to the critical period, WHO highlights several clinical warning signs as potential signs of impending exacerbation [14]. However, predictive models using clinical warning signs are lacking [14]. Establishing an early warning system for severe dengue based on these factors is essential for triaging in endemic areas and optimizing resource utilization [6].

Our previous study used the data to initially explore clinical symptoms of severe dengue among children during the 2019 outbreak in Bangladesh and suggested dengue was more severe in children, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms [9]. However, this study has not explored the high-order and combinative effect on different features. The classification and regression tree (CART) and random forest (RF) models are nonparametric statistical methods that do not rely on assumptions about data distribution to handle multiple independent variables interacting [15]. In this study, we aimed to use both CART and RF to explore the possible combination patterns of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers on severe dengue, eventually providing opportunities for early treatment and prevention of severe dengue and providing a reference for clinicians.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All participants gave written informed consent. The protocol of the survey was approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Biomedical Research Foundation (Memo no: BRF/ERB/2019/017). In case of child participants, formal consent was obtained from the parent/guardian. This study is reported as per the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline for cross-sectional studies (S1 STROBE Statement).

Study site and data collection

This study was conducted in the Dhaka megacity (population = ~20M) of Bangladesh where a massive dengue outbreak occurred in 2019. We used convenience sampling technique to enroll hospitalized dengue cases from eight hospitals (five government and three private hospitals) between 15 August 2019 and 30 September 2019. The diagnosis was confirmed serologically by the positivity of antibodies against the dengue nonstructural glycoprotein 1 (NS1). Trained medical students and doctors collected the data via face-to-face interviews with a structured questionnaire. Data were collected at a one-time point at the convalescent phase to record all the clinical and laboratory complications patients developed during their hospital stay. The questionnaire was developed based on previously published literature and discussions with interdisciplinary teams (e.g., epidemiologists, clinicians, and public health workers), and details of the investigation can be found in the published literature [9]. A total of 1,283 patients with dengue were investigated by a structured questionnaire. Finally, 1,090 dengue cases were included in this study after excluding the incomplete data on age, sex, and type of dengue (missing rate: 14.18%) (S1 Fig).

Standardized questionnaires (S1 Questionnaire) were used to collect information on demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers. Demographic characteristics included age (categorized as <18, 18–39, or ≥ 40 years), sex (dichotomized as men or women), education (categorized as illiterate or children, primary, secondary and high secondary school, or graduate), monthly income (categorized as <1,5000, 1,5000–2,5000, 2,5000–50,000, or ≥ 50,000 Bangladeshi taka), type of residence (categorized as flat, single storied house and other, or tin shade house), history of infection (categorized as dengue, chikungunya, or none), and history of comorbidity (dichotomized as yes or no). Clinical symptoms were asked about the presence of these symptoms [16], which included fever, rash, joint pain, dehydration, itchiness, plasma leakage, hemorrhage (dichotomized as yes or no), and muscle pain, vomiting, headache, decreased appetite, abdominal pain, cough, back pain, dyspnoea, lethargy (categorized as yes, no, or can’t remember). In addition, biochemical markers included platelet counts, hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC, dichotomized as reduced or within normal), and alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) (categorized as raised, within normal, or not done). As per the National Guideline for Clinical Management of Dengue, symptomatic dengue cases were initially divided into three groups: dengue fever (group A), dengue fever with warning signs (group B), and severe dengue (group C). In this study, group A and group B were treated as the non-severe dengue group, while group C was treated as the severe dengue group [17].

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were employed to describe the counts (percentages) of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers grouped by severe dengue and non-severe dengue. Chi-square tests were used for group comparisons. Pairwise spearman’s rank correlations were used to detect the inter-correlations between demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers. In this study, the missing values were less than 5% among most of the covariates. We used a listwise deletion method to deal with the missing data [18]. The logistic regression model was used to explore the associations between demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers, and the risk of severe dengue. We used the variance inflation factor (VIF) to estimate multicollinearity in the multiple logistic regression models.

The CART model was used to examine the combinative effects of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers on severe dengue and to identify the high-order no-linear pattern of developing severe dengue. To get the probability of severe dengue, dengue was treated as a scale factor in CART model. CART model was used to split the data into two parts that were as homogeneous as possible for the dependent variable. We conducted split-sample validation by using random assignment, which allowed the model to be generated using a training sample (80%) and tested on a hold-out sample (20%) [19]. For the minimum number of cases, we set the parent node to 30 and the child node to 10. To avoid overfitting the model, we also pruned the tree. Other parameters were set as default.

The RF model was used to find more important factors among demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers of severe dengue. In this study, the method of mean decreased accuracy was applied to compute the feature importance on permuted out-of-bag (OOB) samples [20]. Higher mean decreased accuracy implied more important features. Data were analyzed using R version 4.1.3 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The CART model was employed in SPSS 27.0. (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A two-sided P value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and the RF model was performed using the ‘randomForest’ and ‘rfPermute’ packages in R software [20].

Results

Basic characteristics of the study participants with dengue

A total of 1,090 dengue cases (158 severe and 932 non-severe) were included in this study. Overall, 652 (59.8%) were men, 553 (50.7%) aged 18–39 years. Compared to patients with non-severe dengue, patients with severe dengue were younger (aged <18 years) and more likely to be illiterate. There was no statistically significant difference between severe and non-severe dengue in other demographic characteristics (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the dengue cases*.

Overall Non-severe dengue Severe dengue P value
(N = 1090) (N = 932) (N = 158)
Sex 0.08
Men 652 (59.8) 568 (60.9) 84 (53.2)
Women 438 (40.2) 364 (39.1) 74 (46.8)
Age group (years) <0.01
<18 318 (29.2) 226 (24.2) 92 (58.2)
18–39 553 (50.7) 507 (54.4) 46 (29.1)
40 and above 219 (20.1) 199 (21.4) 20 (12.7)
Education <0.01
Illiterate or Children 284 (26.1) 223 (23.9) 61 (38.6)
Primary 339 (31.1) 303 (32.5) 36 (22.8)
Secondary & Higher Secondary School 306 (28.1) 264 (28.3) 42 (26.6)
Graduate 112 (10.3) 99 (10.6) 13 (8.2)
Missing 49 (4.5) 43 (4.6) 6 (3.8)
Monthly income (BDT) * 0.36
< 15000 342 (31.4) 290 (31.1) 52 (32.9)
15000–25000 404 (37.1) 353 (37.9) 51 (32.3)
25000–50000 206 (18.9) 169 (18.1) 37 (23.4)
50000 and above 71 (6.5) 60 (6.4) 11 (7.0)
Missing 67 (6.1) 60 (6.4) 7 (4.4)
Type of residence 0.99
Flat 540 (49.5) 461 (49.5) 79 (50.0)
Single storied house 125 (11.5) 107 (11.5) 18 (11.4)
Tin shade house and slum 384 (35.2) 327 (35.1) 57 (36.1)
Missing 41 (3.8) 37 (4.0) 4 (2.5)
History of infection 0.66
Dengue 24 (2.2) 21 (2.3) 3 (1.9)
Chikungunya 116 (10.6) 102 (10.9) 14 (8.9)
None 903 (82.8) 767 (82.3) 136 (86.1)
Missing 47 (4.3) 42 (4.5) 5 (3.2)
History of comorbidity 0.74
Yes 173 (15.9) 146 (15.7) 27 (17.1)
No 917 (84.1) 786 (84.3) 131 (82.9)

BDT, Bangladeshi taka.

* Values are presented as n (%).

Out of 1,090 dengue patients, 1,034 (94.9%) had fever, 691 (63.4%) muscle pain, 837 (76.8%) vomiting, 901 (82.7%) headache, 631 (57.9%) abdominal pain, 651 (59.7%) back pain, and 869 (79.7%) decreased appetite. Compared to patients with non-severe dengue, patients with severe dengue were more likely to have abdominal pain (P value = 0.04) (S1 Table).

Among 1,090 dengue patients, 972 (89.2%) appeared low platelet level, 315 (28.9%) had low hemoglobin level, 404 (37.1%) had low WBC, 183 (16.8%) raised ALT, and 148 (13.6%) raised AST (S2 Table).

Association of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers with the risk of severe dengue

Logistic regression model

In the crude logistic regression model, age, education, headache, abdominal pain, back pain, dyspnoea, plasma leakage, hemorrhage, and WBC were statistically significantly associated with severe dengue (S3 Table). Pairwise spearman’s rank correlation showed that the coefficients among significant factors in the crude logistic regression ranged from -0.16 to 0.32 (S2 Fig). The factors significantly associated with the crude logistic regression model were included in the multiple logistic regression model. All VIF values were under 10 in the multiple logistic regression model, implying no substantial issue in multicollinearity (S4 Table). The results showed that patients with hemorrhage (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.46 to 3.73), plasma leakage (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 2.12 to 6.15), and dyspnoea (OR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.72 to 4.77) were positively associated with the risk of severe dengue (Table 2). The hemorrhage mainly occurred in the gum, hematochezia, and menorrhagia, and plasma leakage mainly in abdomen and chest (S5 Table). Furthermore, severe dengue in the non-DSS group was significantly higher in participants with plasma leakage or hemorrhage than in those without plasma leakage or hemorrhage (S6 Table). Compared to illiterate, primary education was associated with a lower risk of severe dengue (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.85). Compared to patients aged <18 years, patients aged 18–39 years (OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.36) and >40 years (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.35) had less likely to have severe dengue (Table 2).

Table 2. Association of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers with the risk of severe dengue in multiple logistic regression model.
No of non-severe dengue No. of severe dengue OR 95% CI for OR P value
Lower Upper
Age group (years)
<18 226 92 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
18–39 507 46 0.20 0.11 0.36 <0.01
40 and above 199 20 0.17 0.08 0.35 <0.01
Education
Illiterate or Children 223 61 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Primary 303 36 0.47 0.27 0.85 0.01
Secondary & Higher Secondary School 264 42 0.88 0.46 1.66 0.69
Graduate 99 13 0.80 0.33 1.96 0.63
Headache
No 135 36 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 782 119 0.97 0.54 1.73 0.92
Abdominal pain
No 397 53 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 527 104 0.95 0.59 1.54 0.84
Back pain
No 320 69 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 571 80 0.64 0.39 1.06 0.09
Dyspnoea
No 752 95 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 163 60 2.87 1.72 4.77 <0.01
Plasma leakage
No 789 98 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 106 53 3.61 2.12 6.15 <0.01
Hemorrhage
No 682 84 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Yes 216 56 2.33 1.46 3.73 <0.01
White blood cell
Within normal 518 106 1.00 (Ref.) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Reduced 363 41 0.52 0.32 0.85 0.01

CART models

Model I: Demographic characteristics

The CART analysis showed that age (threshold: 11.5 years old) was the main associated factor, explaining 43.1% of severe dengue. S3 Fig shows that the prevalence of severe dengue was 55.2% for women aged between 1.9 and 11.5 years and with monthly income <25,000 BDT. Among patients aged >51.5 years, a higher education level (over primary education) and comorbidity explained 42.9% of severe dengue.

Model II: Clinical symptoms

The prevalence of severe dengue was 76.5% for patients with plasma leakage, dyspnoea, and hemorrhage (S4 Fig). Patients without plasma leakage had 10.7% of severe dengue.

Model III: Biochemical markers

S5 Fig shows that the prevalence of severe dengue was 54.3% for patients whose lowest platelet levels were between 71.5*109/L and 78.5*109/L. The lowest platelet (threshold: 71.5*109/L) was associated with factors for non-severe dengue (93.1%).

Model IV: Combination of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers

The final CART model showed that age, dyspnoea, plasma leakage, and lowest platelet contributed to the predictive power of the CART algorithm. The prevalence of severe dengue across nodes ranged from 7% (age >12.5 years without plasma leakage) to 92.9% (age ≤ 12.5 years with dyspnoea and plasma leakage). The prevalence of severe dengue was 60.0% among people aged > 12.5 years with plasma leakage, and the lowest platelet level was more than 126.5*109/L (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The probability of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers for developing severe dengue in the classification and regression tree (CART) model.

Fig 1

RF model

Fig 2 shows that age was the most important variable (mean decrease accuracy = 23.6%) in predicting severe dengue, followed by education (11.6%), plasma leakage (9.9%), platelet (8.5%), and dyspnoea (7.2%) (S7 Table). The accuracy of RF model was 86.5%, and the OOB estimate of error rate was 13.5%.

Fig 2. The random forest (RF) model identified the important predictors for predicting severe dengue.

Fig 2

Discussion

In this study, we have assessed the potential risk factors of severe dengue during the largest outbreak in Bangladesh in 2019 and detected the high-order combinative effect of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers for developing severe dengue. We found that dyspnoea, plasma leakage, and hemorrhage were the independent risk factors of severe dengue. The predictive probability of occurrence of severe dengue achieved 92.9% among people aged ≤ 12.5 years with dyspnoea and plasma leakage. Furthermore, age was the most crucial variable in predicting severe dengue, followed by education, plasma leakage, platelet, and dyspnoea.

Our research found that age was associated with the risk of severe dengue. A piece of evidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 showed that the age-standardized mortality rate and disability-adjusted life years for dengue in children were higher than in older people [4], which might relate to fragile capillaries in children than adults [21]. As previous studies reported, we found that the prevalence of severe dengue increased in specific populations, such as the older with comorbidities [22]. However, the degree of severity of dengue may differ from the different diseases [23], the type of comorbidity should be investigated in the future study. Additionally, our study found that patients who received higher educational levels were less likely to be infected with severe dengue, possibly because patients with higher educational attainment may be better aware of dengue infection and seek professional help promptly [24]. Moreover, women were more likely to be infected with severe dengue than men in this study. Results from several studies supported that men were likely to be infected with dengue in dengue epidemics, but women were more likely associated with severe dengue [25]. Sex-specific may be related to differences in visit time and type of care [26]. Therefore, educational public health campaigns might target lower-income areas, individuals with comorbidities, and families with children.

The most common characteristic of severe dengue is plasma leakage followed by hemorrhage [27], which supported our findings. Interestingly, we found that plasma leakage occurred mainly in children, which may be related to the lower leakage threshold in children than in adults [28]. Furthermore, we found that plasma leakage occurred mainly in the abdomen and chest, and that people with ascites and pleural effusion were more likely to develop severe dengue. Plasma leakage is an important outcome for dengue, as most complications occurred in this group. Identifying all plasma leakage is an important factor in preventing complications, but neither WHO classification fully covers the plasma leakage subgroup [29,30]. In addition, the definition and development of criteria for diagnosing plasma leakage have long been neglected, resulting in challenging and underreporting of plasma leakage. It is recommended that standardization of diagnosis and reporting of plasma leakage should be a research priority for dengue [31]. Moreover, we found that patients with hemorrhage were more likely to develop severe dengue than those without hemorrhage. Hemorrhage during dengue infection ranges from self-limiting epistaxis and bleeding gums to life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding. In addition, previous studies have found that hemorrhage is often attributed to thrombocytopenia [32], which is consistent with our findings. Thrombocytopenia and hemorrhage in dengue may result from cytokine-induced immune dysfunction and platelet destruction following the binding of dengue-specific antibodies to virus-infected platelets [32]. Lower platelet counts were more common in severe dengue [33] and were considered a risk factor for bleeding [34]. During dengue fever, platelet counts declined until fever subsides, then recovered rapidly [35]. Furthermore, we found that dyspnoea was a vital sign of severe dengue. Published research showed a significant association of dyspnoea with shock, which may result from fluid overload due to pulmonary congestion caused by capillary leakage [36]. Early recognition and treatment of dyspnea are essential for preventing severe dengue.

Furthermore, clinicians should be vigilant in identifying dengue patients, as prompt identification and early treatment of dengue remain the cornerstone of reducing morbidity and mortality [37]. In recent years, climate change, environmental pollution, poor health systems, and population growth have been exacerbating the dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh [38]. Clinicians should be aware of the different presentations of severe dengue in children versus adults and carefully evaluate the children for plasma leakage, which may be more challenging to identify than severe bleeding. As reported, if detected early and with appropriate medical care, the mortality rate of dengue was less than 1% in Bangladesh [39]. To reduce mortality from severe dengue, clinicians need to be trained in managing severe dengue [40] and focus on the high-risk populations of dengue-affected areas [41]. The results of our study identified possible combinations of severe dengue, which would provide an essential reference for the early identification, and treatment of severe dengue fever, especially for patients without DSS.

In the research, we used machine learning algorithms, including CART and RF, to find key risk factors and to identify the combined effect of risk factors on all severe dengue cases, which include cases with key symptoms such as hemorrhage and plasma leakage etc, and without these key symptoms. Our results will provide very useful warning signals for all dengue cases for clinical doctors. However, there are some limitations to this study. First, our results need to be confirmed by further prospective studies due to the cross-sectional design. Some risk factors, especially biomarkers and clinical symptoms, may be affected by the process of dengue. Second, the biomarkers, such as platelet counts, were only measured once in this study. However, the levels of biomarkers were more likely to be affected by the status and treatment of diseases. The changes in biomarkers (particularly platelet counts) may carry meaningful information, and developing models incorporating repeatedly measured longitudinal data will improve the accuracy of risk prediction. However, results from the present study have provided new evidence on the high-order interactive effects of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers, and severe dengue. The finding will provide enhanced insight into clinical treatment and inform prevention programming for severe dengue. Third, due to regional differences, the results of this study may not be generalizable to other regions. Fourth, patients were interviewed during the convalescent phase; therefore, some recall biases are inevitable in this study. However, this should be negligible as most of the dengue patients reach convalescent within 7–10 days of starting symptoms [29]. Lastly, given that the risk of developing severe dengue could be associated with secondary infections [42]. The study did not explore this relationship because of lack of detailed data on IgG (an indicator of secondary infection) and dengue virus serotypes.

In conclusion, combined with socio-environmental factors, early recognition and treatment of dyspnoea, plasma leakage, and hemorrhage are vital to the prevention of severe dengue. The research provides new evidence to identify key risk factors that contribute to severe dengue cases, which would add new evidence for the early identification and treatment of severe dengue fever. Future research is required to further explore the progression and shifting from non-severe dengue to severe dengue based on the research finding.

Supporting information

S1 STROBE Statement. Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies.

(DOCX)

S1 Questionnaire. Data collection form.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Flowchart of participant selection.

Abbreviation: DMCH: Dhaka Medical College Hospital; KuGH: Kurmitola General Hospital; MuMCH: Mugda Medical College Hospital; PMCH: Popular Medical College Hospital; DrSIMCH: Dr Sirajul Islam Medical College Hospital; ShMCH: Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital; MHSHMC: MH Samorita Hospital and Medical College; SSMC: Sir Salimullah Medical College Hospital.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The correlations between demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers were selected in the single logistic regression model.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. The patterns of demographic characteristics for developing severe dengue in the classification and regression tree (CART) model.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. The patterns of clinical symptoms for developing severe dengue in classification and regression tree (CART) model.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. The patterns of biochemical markers for developing severe dengue in classification and regression tree (CART) model.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue*.

* Values are presented as n (%).

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Laboratory findings of the patients grouped by severity of dengue*.

Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase. * Values are presented as n (%).

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Association of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers with the risk of severe dengue in crude logistic regression model.

Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Collinearity analysis (variance inflation factor, VIFs) in multiple logistic regression model.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue and the site of haemorrhage and plasma leakage*.

* Values are presented as n (%).

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue and DSS*.

Abbreviation: DSS, dengue shock syndrome. * Values are presented as n (%).

(DOCX)

S7 Table. The random forest model identified the important predictors on the prediction of severe dengue.

Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the following persons for supporting data collection: Mahbubul H Siddiqee (Biomedical Research Foundation, Bangladesh); Professor Robed Amin and Associate Professor Dr. Syed Ghulam Mogni Mowla(Dhaka Medical College Hospital), Lt Col ABM Belayet Hossain and Farah Noor (Kurmitola General Hospital), Associate Professor Sudip Ranjan Deb (Mugda Medical College Hospital), Professor HAM Nazmul Ahsan and Professor Quazi Tarikul Islam (Popular Medical College Hospital) Associate Professor Sabrina Yesmin (Dr. Sirajul Islam Medical College Hospital), Associate Professor Nazmul Ahsan and Associate Professor Mohammad Rafiqul Islam (Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital), Professor Syeda Afroza (Samaritan Hospital and Medical College), and Associate Professor Amiruzzaman Sir Salimullah Medical College Hospital. Besides, Jingli Yang would thank the support from the Queensland University of Technology and the China Scholarship Council (CSC).

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

Field-level data collection was partially funded by Techno Drug Ltd, Bangladesh to MSH, grant number Techno-2019-01. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. Health Topics: Dengue and severe dengue 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 22]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/dengue-and-severe-dengue#tab=tab_1.
  • 2.Sim S, Hibberd ML. Genomic approaches for understanding dengue: insights from the virus, vector, and host. Genome Biology. 2016;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0907-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. Newsroom: Dengue and severe dengue 2022 [cited 2022 January 10]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue.
  • 4.Lin Y, Fang K, Zheng Y, Wang H-l, Wu J. Global burden and trends of neglected tropical diseases from 1990 to 2019. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2022;29(3). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang WH, Chen HJ, Lin CY, Assavalapsakul W, Wang SF. Imported dengue fever and climatic variation are important determinants facilitating dengue epidemics in Southern Taiwan. J Infect. 2020;80(1):121–42. Epub 2019/08/21. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wilder-Smith A, Ooi E-E, Horstick O, Wills B. Dengue. The Lancet. 2019;393(10169):350–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32560-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mahmood S, Irshad A, Nasir JM, Sharif F, Farooqi SH. Spatiotemporal analysis of dengue outbreaks in Samanabad town, Lahore metropolitan area, using geospatial techniques. Environ Monit Assess. 2019;191(2):55. Epub 2019/01/09. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7162-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Da Conceição Araújo D, Dos Santos AD, Lima S, Vaez AC, Cunha JO, Conceição Gomes Machado de Araújo K. Determining the association between dengue and social inequality factors in north-eastern Brazil: A spatial modelling. Geospat Health. 2020;15(1). Epub 2020/06/25. doi: 10.4081/gh.2020.854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Khan MAS, Al Mosabbir A, Raheem E, Ahmed A, Rouf RR, Hasan M, et al. Clinical spectrum and predictors of severity of dengue among children in 2019 outbreak: a multicenter hospital-based study in Bangladesh. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):478. Epub 2021/10/31. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02947-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Salje H, Paul KK, Paul R, Rodriguez-Barraquer I, Rahman Z, Alam MS, et al. Nationally-representative serostudy of dengue in Bangladesh allows generalizable disease burden estimates. Elife. 2019;8. Epub 2019/04/09. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stanaway JD, Shepard DS, Undurraga EA, Halasa YA, Coffeng LE, Brady OJ, et al. The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(6):712–23. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00026-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Salazar F, Angeles J, Sy AK, Inobaya MT, Aguila A, Toner T, et al. Efficacy of the In2Care auto-dissemination device for reducing dengue transmission: study protocol for a parallel, two-armed cluster randomised trial in the Philippines. Trials. 2019;20(1):269. Epub 2019/05/16. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3376-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gyawali N, Bradbury RS, Taylor-Robinson AW. The epidemiology of dengue infection: Harnessing past experience and current knowledge to support implementation of future control strategies. J Vector Borne Dis. 2016;53(4):293–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morra ME, Altibi AMA, Iqtadar S, Minh LHN, Elawady SS, Hallab A, et al. Definitions for warning signs and signs of severe dengue according to the WHO 2009 classification: Systematic review of literature. Rev Med Virol. 2018;28(4):e1979. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang N, Cong S, Fan J, Bao H, Wang B, Yang T, et al. Geographical Disparity and Associated Factors of COPD Prevalence in China: A Spatial Analysis of National Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:367–77. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prattay KMR, Sarkar MR, Shafiullah AZM, Islam MS, Raihan SZ, Sharmin N. A retrospective study on the socio-demographic factors and clinical parameters of dengue disease and their effects on the clinical course and recovery of the patients in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(4):e0010297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WHO. Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization.; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bennett DA. How can I deal with missing data in my study? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(5):464–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feng C, Kephart G, Juarez-Colunga E. Predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in Toronto, Canada: a comparison of tree-based and regression-based machine learning methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):267. Epub 2021/11/29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01441-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32. doi: 10.1023/a:1010933404324 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hammond SN, Balmaseda A, Pérez L, Tellez Y, Saborío SI, Mercado JC, et al. Differences in dengue severity in infants, children, and adults in a 3-year hospital-based study in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73(6):1063–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wong JM, Adams LE, Durbin AP, Muñoz-Jordán JL, Poehling KA, Sánchez-González LM, et al. Dengue: A Growing Problem With New Interventions. Pediatrics. 2022;149(6). Epub 2022/05/12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-055522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin RJ, Lee TH, Leo YS. Dengue in the elderly: a review. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(8):729–35. Epub 2017/07/22. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2017.1358610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sayavong C, Chompikul J, Wongsawass S, Rattanapan C. Knowledge, attitudes and preventive behaviors related to dengue vector breeding control measures among adults in communities of Vientiane, capital of the Lao PDR. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(5):466–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huy NT, Giang TV, Thuy DHD, Kikuchi M, Hien TT, Zamora J, et al. Factors Associated with Dengue Shock Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013;7(9). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Anders KL, Nguyen MN, Nguyen VVC, Nguyen TH, Tran TT, Le BL, et al. Epidemiological Factors Associated with Dengue Shock Syndrome and Mortality in Hospitalized Dengue Patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2011;84(1):127–34. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Paz-Bailey G, Sánchez-González L, Torres-Velasquez B, Jones E, Perez-Padilla J, Sharp TM, et al. Predominance of severe plasma leakage in pediatric patients with severe dengue in Puerto Rico. J Infect Dis. 2022. Epub 2022/05/06. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Trung DT, Thao le TT, Dung NM, Ngoc TV, Hien TT, Chau NV, et al. Clinical features of dengue in a large Vietnamese cohort: intrinsically lower platelet counts and greater risk for bleeding in adults than children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(6):e1679. Epub 2012/06/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Organization WH, Research SPf, Diseases TiT, Diseases WHODoCoNT, Epidemic WHO, Alert P. Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control: World Health Organization; 2009. [PubMed]
  • 30.Organization WH. Dengue haemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control: World Health Organization; 1997.
  • 31.Rodrigo C, Sigera C, Fernando D, Rajapakse S. Plasma leakage in dengue: a systematic review of prospective observational studies. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06793-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee TH, Lee LK, Lye DC, Leo YS. Current management of severe dengue infection. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(1):67–78. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2017.1248405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brasier AR, Ju H, Garcia J, Spratt HM, Victor SS, Forshey BM, et al. A three-component biomarker panel for prediction of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(2):341–8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Krishnamurti C, Kalayanarooj S, Cutting MA, Peat RA, Rothwell SW, Reid TJ, et al. Mechanisms of hemorrhage in dengue without circulatory collapse. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65(6):840–7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.The TD, Thao LTT, Minh DN, Van NT, Tinh HT, Chau NVV, et al. Clinical Features of Dengue in a Large Vietnamese Cohort: Intrinsically Lower Platelet Counts and Greater Risk for Bleeding in Adults than Children. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2012;6(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wakimoto MD, Camacho LAB, Gonin ML, Brasil P. Clinical and Laboratory Factors Associated with Severe Dengue: A Case-Control Study of Hospitalized Children. J Trop Pediatr. 2018;64(5):373–81. Epub 2017/10/24. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmx078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lam PK, Tam DT, Diet TV, Tam CT, Tien NT, Kieu NT, et al. Clinical characteristics of Dengue shock syndrome in Vietnamese children: a 10-year prospective study in a single hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(11):1577–86. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mone FH, Hossain S, Hasan MT, Tajkia G, Ahmed F. Sustainable actions needed to mitigate dengue outbreak in Bangladesh. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(11):1166–7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30541-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cousins S. Dengue rises in Bangladesh. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(2):138. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30008-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hsan K, Hossain MM, Sarwar MS, Wilder-Smith A, Gozal D. Unprecedented rise in dengue outbreaks in Bangladesh. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(12):1287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30616-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Brady O. Mapping the emerging burden of dengue. Elife. 2019;8. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Soo KM, Khalid B, Ching SM, Chee HY. Meta-Analysis of Dengue Severity during Infection by Different Dengue Virus Serotypes in Primary and Secondary Infections. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154760. Epub 2016/05/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011161.r001

Decision Letter 0

Marc Choisy, Abdallah M Samy

27 Oct 2022

Dear Dr. Hossain,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers and probability of occurrence of severe dengue: A multicenter hospital-based study in Bangladesh" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Marc Choisy

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abdallah Samy

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Editor comments: The 3 reviewers found the study has potential but all of them raised major issues regarding both the analyses and the writing. We are happy to consider a resubmission of your manuscript if you think you will be able to address all the reviewers' comments.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: This study is designed well but there is a need to improve further on the following parts:

1. Sample size calculation

2. Definition of severe and non-severe dengue

3. How the collinearity assessment was done between different variables

4. Clear explanation on co-morbidity, hemorrhage and plasma leakage

Reviewer #2: This is an exploratory analysis, so there is no specific hypothesis.

This is a large population from Bangladesh including both severe and non-severe dengue cases, which is appropriate for exploring variables that may differentiate between severe and non-severe dengue.

Can the authors please state how dengue was diagnosed? Did they use PCR, serology, both? Do they have data on which serotypes were causing infection?

Since this is a cross-sectional study, I expect only 1 time point was measured. However, the author's should state this explicitly. If only one time point was measured, I think the authors should report and control for days post symptom onset in their models. Per the data form shared in the supplementary material, it looks like symptom onset day may have been collected.

Additionally, can the authors explain how they defined dengue and non-severe dengue? In the methods, they explain that they dichotomized the data as non-severe and severe dengue, and then they cite the WHO criteria. This is confusing to me because, according to their models, the three variables with the strongest association with severe dengue (plasma leakage, hemorrhage, and dyspnea) are all part of the WHO criteria for severe dengue. If they used the WHO criteria to define severe dengue wouldn't it follow that the models would reflect the WHO criteria when identifying variables associated with severe dengue? Maybe I am misunderstanding how these models work, but then I think it would be helpful to walk the reader through this a bit more.

This is just a suggestion, but it might actually be informative to do an unsupervised clustering analysis where they just see which variables cluster together without considering whether the dengue is severe or not. This would remove the WHO definitions from the model and might allow the authors to just observe which variables cluster together and potentially independently confirm the WHO definitions.

Reviewer #3: This is a large and unique clinical cohort which includes 1,090 participants (932 non-severe patients and 158 severe patients). This study also includes both adult and pediatric participants which allows them to evaluate age-dependent differences in the development of severe dengue.

The authors use multiple non-parametric measures to identify patterns in their data which have enabled them to quantify the clinical, demographic and laboratory parameters which increase the probability of developing severe dengue.

Patient questionnaires were performed during the convalescent phase of dengue infection and therefore may not be sensitive or specific for the prognosis of severe dengue.

This is a single cohort study and it is unclear if these findings could be extrapolated to other dengue endemic areas which may have different epidemiological aspects or common co-infections such as malaria.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Results are presented well but there is need to improve further on:

1. Tabular presentation

2. Sentence struture

Reviewer #2: The analysis does match the analysis plan and the tables are clear, well structured, and helpful.

The figures are a bit blurry, and the explanation of figure 1 seems to have a typo (line 220).

Reviewer #3: The presentation of the results from Figure 1 describing the CART model are difficult to interpret. Generating a figure which more clearly visualizes the mean and SD for each node would improve understanding of the results.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: There is no conclusion in the manuscript. It is suggested to include a paragraph to summarize the finding at the end of the discussion

Reviewer #2: Can the authors do a bit better job explaining what their study adds to the literature? For example, in line 238 - 239, they state that "The predictive probability of occurrence of severe dengue achieved 92.9% among people aged ≤ 12.5 years with dyspnoea and plasma leakage." But, if a clinician just follows the WHO criteria, then 100% of patients with plasma leakage would meet the criteria for severe dengue. The same is true for line 257, where they report that those with hemorrhage were 2.33 times more likely to develop severe dengue. But, if a clinician just follows WHO criteria, then 100% of patients with dengue and hemorrhage have severe dengue. So, I just don't really understand what the added value is of the model. Could the authors help readers understand that a bit better?

I think the associations between severe dengue and age and education levels are interesting and notable, but of course may not be generalizable to all cohorts. This limited generalizability should be noted.

The authors make a few conclusions stating that their data provides "new evidence" (line 292) or "enhanced insight into clinical treatment" (line 294), but I am not sure that these conclusions are well justified. Can the authors explain what the new evidence is and how this will impact clinical treatment and prevention? It seemed that the clinical markers they report here are all consistent with the WHO criteria, so they seem to be confirming the WHO criteria rather then adding to them. The age and educational associations with severe dengue could potentially be helpful though. For example, educational public health campaigns might target lower income areas and families with children.

In line 283, the authors state that "This study is the first to study severe dengue from a multi-index and multimethod perspective." Again, I am not sure this is quite true. There are a number of meta-analyses and cohort studies that have examined severe dengue and the authors may consider citing some of these. For example, Yaun et al. PLOS NTD, 2022. Sangkaew et al. Lancet ID, 2021. Paz-Bailey et al. JID 2022.

Reviewer #3: The authors state the clear public health relevance of evaluating risk factors associated with severe dengue given dengue remains a WHO top ten global health threat with increasing mortality rates.

The authors do not fully describe the limitations of using study questionnaires during the convalescent phase of infection or discuss potential recall biases during interviews. Given that there was no association between primary and secondary dengue infections and severity, a well known risk factor for developing severe dengue, it would be important to discuss these challenges.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Line 293: seems to have a typo of "n"

Line 253: what do they mean by nursing? Is there some data to suggest that breastfeeding women are at higher risk for severe dengue? Do they know if many of the women in their cohort were breastfeeding? Since they have the data, it might be helpful to see if the sex differences were true in children and adults. If they only saw sex differences in adults, then potentially there is some hormonal component?

Reviewer #3: The quality of the tables and figures should be improved. Figure 1 and 2 are blurry and at times the wording is not clear.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: This is an exploratory analysis of a large cohort of hospitalized patients in Bangladesh. The study is strengthened by its large sample size of both severe and non-severe dengue cases. The authors report some interesting findings including the association of age and low education with severe dengue, and higher frequencies of plasma leakage in children. However, it would be helpful to know how dengue was diagnosed and how severe vs. non-severe dengue was determined. Additionally, I was confused by the models since it seemed that the variables that were strongly associated with severe dengue are part of the WHO criteria for severe dengue. Thus, I didn't understand the added value of the models. Can the authors expand on how these models add to the WHO criteria?

Reviewer #3: In this manuscript, Yang et al. report the results of a cross-sectional study in which they performed structured face-to-face interviews with a total 1,090 participants with dengue infection in Bangladesh. They looked specifically at patient demographics, laboratory findings, and clinical symptoms which were associated with participants who developed severe dengue based on the 2009 WHO criteria.

The authors concluded that several factors were positively associated with severe dengue including dyspnea, plasma leakage and hemorrhage. They also applied a nonparametric statistic model in order to identify patterns in the data which increase the probability of developing severe dengue. This analysis revealed that age ( <= 12.5 yrs) was the most important factor in predicting severe dengue along with education, plasma leakage, platelet count and dyspnea. Taken together the authors state that this data may assist clinicians in the early identification and prediction of severe dengue cases.

Strengths:

The size of the cohort and the number of severe dengue participants adds to our overall understanding of factors associated with severe dengue. The enrollment of young children also allows for more indepth analyses. The use of multiple non-parametric statistical analyses with similar findings strengths the results.

Weakness:

The findings of this study generally coincide with the known associations of severe dengue which are part of the WHO classifications (thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage, plasma leakage). Children have also previously been found to be at increased risk for developing severe dengue and to have higher mortality rates. Therefore there is limited novelty in these findings and it is unclear what additional benefit they would add to support clinical decision making.

Additional experiments:

• Given the strong correlation with age with disease severity, the authors should consider subsampling their cohort by age and evaluating whether there are specific associations with severe dengue in adults only and children only. This may aid in generating more precision approaches to predicting severe dengue.

• The authors used the 2009 WHO criteria to classify patients. These criteria include uncomplicated dengue, dengue with warning signs (an intermediate classification which has higher likelihood of progressing to severe dengue) and severe dengue. If the authors have the data evaluating the clinical and laboratory findings in uncomplicated dengue patients and dengue with warning signs patients at admission who then progressed to severe dengue during their hospitalization would add to predictive power of their findings.

• Since the authors used the 2009 criteria to diagnose severe dengue which include organ impairment as part of the criteria it’s unclear how these patients may have affected outcomes as patients with plasma leakage/hemorrhage and organ damage may have two distinct immuno-pathogeneses. Separating the severe dengue patients by syndrome may further clarify the association of plasma leakage and hemorrhage with severity.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Camila D. Odio

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review_comments.docx

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011161.r003

Decision Letter 1

Marc Choisy, Abdallah M Samy

10 Feb 2023

Dear Dr. Hossain,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers and probability of occurrence of severe dengue:A multicenter hospital-based study in Bangladesh' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Marc Choisy

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abdallah Samy

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

The three reviewers and myself think that you did a very deep revision of your manuscript that successfully addressed all the weakness of the first version, both on the content and the form.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: All queries were addressed in the revised draft

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Results are presented according to the analysis plan

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Conclusions were drawn based on the data

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors' revisions were thorough and helpful. I now understand that they are using the models to differentiate among the markers of severe dengue and identify which ones are most strongly associated with severe dengue. I think this paper is a useful addition to the literature on the clinical presentations of severe dengue and may be beneficial to clinical providers.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Camila D. Odio

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011161.r004

Acceptance letter

Marc Choisy, Abdallah M Samy

9 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Hossain,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, biochemical markers and probability of occurrence of severe dengue:A multicenter hospital-based study in Bangladesh," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 STROBE Statement. Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Questionnaire. Data collection form.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Flowchart of participant selection.

    Abbreviation: DMCH: Dhaka Medical College Hospital; KuGH: Kurmitola General Hospital; MuMCH: Mugda Medical College Hospital; PMCH: Popular Medical College Hospital; DrSIMCH: Dr Sirajul Islam Medical College Hospital; ShMCH: Suhrawardy Medical College Hospital; MHSHMC: MH Samorita Hospital and Medical College; SSMC: Sir Salimullah Medical College Hospital.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. The correlations between demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers were selected in the single logistic regression model.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. The patterns of demographic characteristics for developing severe dengue in the classification and regression tree (CART) model.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. The patterns of clinical symptoms for developing severe dengue in classification and regression tree (CART) model.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. The patterns of biochemical markers for developing severe dengue in classification and regression tree (CART) model.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue*.

    * Values are presented as n (%).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Laboratory findings of the patients grouped by severity of dengue*.

    Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase. * Values are presented as n (%).

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Association of demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and biochemical markers with the risk of severe dengue in crude logistic regression model.

    Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Collinearity analysis (variance inflation factor, VIFs) in multiple logistic regression model.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue and the site of haemorrhage and plasma leakage*.

    * Values are presented as n (%).

    (DOCX)

    S6 Table. Clinical features of the patients grouped by severity of dengue and DSS*.

    Abbreviation: DSS, dengue shock syndrome. * Values are presented as n (%).

    (DOCX)

    S7 Table. The random forest model identified the important predictors on the prediction of severe dengue.

    Abbreviation: WBC, white blood cell; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review_comments.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: R1_ResponseLetter_dengue_PLOSNTD_21 Dec 2022.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES