NCT00409708.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | A 12‐week parallel trial with 2 arms:
Phases: 1 or 2 (there is mention of a washout, but it appears to happen after the trial) |
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: 142 Number of participants included: 109 randomised, baseline characteristics from 104 (66 boys, 38 girls) Number of participants followed‐up: 77 Number of withdrawals: 32 Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐IV (subtype not stated) Age: mean 8.4 years (SD 1.83, range 6‐12) IQ: not stated MPH‐naive: not stated Ethnicity: not stated Country: USA Setting: outpatient Comorbidity: some were exclusion criteria Comedication: not stated Additional sociodemographics: not stated Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to: receive either behavior therapy alone or with MPH. Number randomised to each group: 56 randomised to behavior therapy, 53 randomised to behavior therapy and MPH Mean medication dosage: not stated. Participants received between 10‐60 mg/d Administration schedule: not stated Duration of each medication: 12 weeks Washout before trial initiation: there is mention of a washout, but it appears to happen after the trial. Titration period: not stated Treatment compliance: not stated |
|
Outcomes |
ADHD symptoms
Serious AEs
Non‐serious AEs
|
|
Notes | Sample calculation: no Ethics approval: not stated Exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH: not stated Any withdrawals due to AEs: no Funding source: Novartis |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Almost a third of participants withdrew. Reasons for withdrawals are not stated. Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): unclear |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Since no cytogenetic effects were observed, blood samples were not analysed for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, otherwise all outcomes reported |