Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;2023(3):CD009885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub3

NCT00409708.

Study characteristics
Methods A 12‐week parallel trial with 2 arms:
  • behavior therapy

  • ER‐MPH and behavior therapy


Phases: 1 or 2 (there is mention of a washout, but it appears to happen after the trial)
Participants Number of participants screened: 142
Number of participants included: 109 randomised, baseline characteristics from 104 (66 boys, 38 girls)
Number of participants followed‐up: 77
Number of withdrawals: 32
Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐IV (subtype not stated)
Age: mean 8.4 years (SD 1.83, range 6‐12)
IQ: not stated
MPH‐naive: not stated
Ethnicity: not stated
Country: USA
Setting: outpatient
Comorbidity: some were exclusion criteria
Comedication: not stated
Additional sociodemographics: not stated
Inclusion criteria
  • Children of both genders, 6‐12 years old

  • Written informed consent by the parent and the patient (over 7 years old)

  • Diagnosis of ADHD

  • Age‐appropriate cognitive functioning

  • All patients who had at least one post‐baseline cytogenetic assessment in the core trial can enter the observation phase


Exclusion criteria
  • History of malignant neoplasm

  • History of seizures (except childhood febrile seizures)

  • Hyperthyroidism

  • Concurrent medical condition which may interfere with trial

Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to: receive either behavior therapy alone or with MPH.
Number randomised to each group: 56 randomised to behavior therapy, 53 randomised to behavior therapy and MPH
Mean medication dosage: not stated. Participants received between 10‐60 mg/d
Administration schedule: not stated
Duration of each medication: 12 weeks
Washout before trial initiation: there is mention of a washout, but it appears to happen after the trial.
Titration period: not stated
Treatment compliance: not stated
Outcomes ADHD symptoms
  • Conners' ADHD/DSM‐IV Scale for Parents (CADS‐P) assessed at baseline to end of treatment (Week 12)


Serious AEs
  • Spontaneous reporting


Non‐serious AEs
  • Spontaneous reporting

Notes Sample calculation: no
Ethics approval: not stated
Exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH: not stated
Any withdrawals due to AEs: no
Funding source: Novartis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Almost a third of participants withdrew. Reasons for withdrawals are not stated.
Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Since no cytogenetic effects were observed, blood samples were not analysed for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, otherwise all outcomes reported