NCT02293655.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | A 4‐week parallel discontinuation trial with 2 arms:
|
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: 204 Number of participants included: 109 (72 boys, 37 girls) Number of participants followed up: 100 Number of withdrawals: 9 (no reason given) Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐5 (type not stated) Age: range 7‐11 IQ: < 80 MPH‐naive: not stated Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino (n = 9), not Hispanic or Latino (n = 100). Race: white (n = 88), more than one race (n = 10), black or African American (n = 8), Asian (n = 3) Country: USA Setting: outpatient Comorbidity: not stated Comedication: all psychiatric medications were exclusion criteria Additional sociodemographics: none Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to either discontinue MPH (and receive placebo) or remain on optimal dose of MPH (OROS‐MPH) for 4 weeks. Number randomised to each group: MPH = 17, placebo = 92 Mean medication dosage: not stated Administration schedule: once daily Duration (of (each) medication): 4 weeks Washout before trial initiation: none Medication‐free period between interventions: none Titration period: 4‐week placebo controlled MPH titration trial before randomisation (followed by a 4 weeks of maintenance phase at optimal dosage) Treatment compliance: not stated, but according to the protocol compliance will be elaborated at each visit |
|
Outcomes |
ADHD symptoms
Serious AEs
General behavior
Non‐serious AEs
All outcomes assessed at baseline, during the maintenance period and 3 times during the discontinuation trial on/around day 1, 14 and 28 Only the Parent Vanderbilt ADHD‐RS Total Symptom Score and prevalence of side effect data were available for the review |
|
Notes | Sample calculation: not stated Ethics approval: not stated Exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH: yes; participants were only randomised if they completed the dose titration and maintenance phases Any withdrawals due to AEs: not stated Funding source: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information on method of sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information on method of allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "With blinded randomisation during MPH titration Trial and Discontinuation Phase (through use of over‐encapsulated medication and identical placebos), the entire trial will be triple‐blind (i.e., participant families, trial staff, and teachers will be blinded to medication and dose)" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "With blinded randomisation during MPH Titration Trial and Discontinuation Phase (through use of over‐encapsulated medication and identical placebos), the entire trial will be triple‐blind (i.e., participant families, trial staff, and teachers will be blinded to medication and dose)" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information regarding reason for withdrawals and method of analysis Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): not stated |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | All outcomes have not been published yet |