NCT02536105.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | A 4‐week cross‐over trial with 4 arms:
Phases: 3 (screening and wash‐out, open‐label titration phase, and double‐blind trial) |
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: 88, of which 80 were included in the open‐label phase Number of participants included: 76 randomised in double‐blind trial (59 boys, 21 girls) Number of participants followed‐up: 67 in MPH tablet 1 group, 72 in placebo group, 66 in MPH tablet 2 group, 68 in oral suspension group Number of withdrawals: unclear Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐5 (subtype not stated) Age: mean 9.45 (SD 1.86, range 6‐12) IQ: not stated MPH‐naive: not stated Ethnicity: Asian (n = 2), black or African American (n = 14), white (n = 45), mixed race (n = 16), race unknown or not reported (n = 3) Country: USA Setting: outpatient Comorbidity: specific phobia, motor skills disorders, ODD, sleep disorders, elimination disorders, adjustment disorders, learning disorders, or communication disorders are allowed Comedication: no Additional sociodemographics: none Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 24 different medication orders of 1 week of 3 different types of MPH at optimised dosage (between 18‐72 mg) or placebo Number randomised to each group: not stated Mean medication dosage: not stated Administration schedule: not stated Duration of each medication: 1 week Washout before trial initiation: 3‐7 days (with the exception of atomoxetine, clonidine, guanfacine or a MAOI, which require a 28‐day washout) Medication‐free period between interventions: none Titration period: appears to be 8 weeks (until visit 8 in trial protocol) Treatment compliance: not stated |
|
Outcomes |
ADHD symptoms
Serious AEs
Non‐serious AEs
|
|
Notes | Sample calculation: yes, 150 Ethics approval: yes Exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH: yes, during the dose‐optimisation phase Any withdrawals due to AEs: not stated Funding source: Massachusetts General Hospital Email correspondence with trial authors: August 2021. We contacted the trial authors for information regarding risk of bias and first‐period data through personal email in August 2021; however, as the contact investigator has retired, we were unable to receive any answers. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | "The order of assignment will be generated by a statistician who is not involved in any of the trial procedures" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Blinding ensured at external facility |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The external facility will ensure the packaging for the placebo and active are identical" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Only one staff member unblinded at all times for emergencies |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The missing data will not be imputed and the incomplete individual observations will be included in the analyses as the non‐linear mixed effect modeling approach used to conduct the PK and the PK/PD [Pharmacokinetic‐Pharmacodynamic] analyses does not require complete data sets" Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): no |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | ADHD‐RS‐IV and CGI‐S not reported |