Palumbo 2008.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, 16‐week, parallel trial with 2 × 2 factorial design:
2 successive 4‐week titration periods followed by an 8‐week maintenance period |
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: 205 Number of participants included: 122 (98 boys, 24 girls) Number followed up: 93 (MPH 18, placebo 10, MPH + clonidine 24, clonidine 31) Number of withdrawals: 44 (MPH 11, placebo 20, MPH + clonidine 8, clonidine 5) DSM‐IV diagnosis of ADHD (combined (76%), hyperactive‐impulsive (4%), inattentive (20%)) Age: mean 9.5 (range not reported) IQ: > 70 MPH‐naive: 57 (46.7%) Ethnicity: white (77.9%), African American (10.7%), Hispanic (6.6%), other (4.9%) Country: USA Setting: outpatient clinic Co‐morbidity: ODD (47%), CD (9%) Co‐medication: not allowed, but all participants received protocol‐based behavioural interventions Other sociodemographics: participant groups were similar except for a higher percentage of white children in the clonidine group and some minor differences with regard to family history of ADHD and tics Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Previous use of MPH or clonidine was permitted |
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to IR‐MPH or placebo Number randomised to each group: MPH 29, placebo 30, MPH + clonidine 32, clonidine 31 Mean MPH dosage: 0.76 ± 0.54 mg/kg/d (30.2 ± 18.9 mg/d (MPH‐only group) and 25.4 ± 18.2 mg/d (MPH + clonidine)) Administration schedule: 1‐3 times daily (morning, noon and afternoon) Duration of intervention: 12‐16 weeks Washout before trial initiation: 2 weeks Titration period: 8‐week flexible‐dose titration period (4 weeks for clonidine, then 4 weeks for MPH) initiated after randomisation Maintenance period of optimal dose: 8 weeks Treatment compliance: monitored using pill counts (results of monitoring not stated) |
|
Outcomes |
ADHD symptoms
Quality of life
Non‐serious AEs
|
|
Notes | Sample calculation: yes; sample size of 140 participants (35 per treatment group) was determined to provide between 80% and 90% power to detect a group difference (effects of clonidine)
Ethics approval: yes; approved by the institutional review board at each site Comments from trial authors
Key conclusions of trial authors
Exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH before randomisation: no Any withdrawals due to AEs: moderate to severe AEs were cited as a reason for withdrawal in 8 participants: MPH + clonidine 5, clonidine 2, MPH 1
Funding source: NIH and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Email correspondence with trial authors: March 2014 to June 2014. We attempted to obtain supplemental efficacy data from the trial authors |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation plan included stratification by centre (investigator) and by sexual maturity status (Prepubertal: Tanner I‐II, Pubertal: Tanner III‐V) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Only the programmer in the Biostatistics Centre and the pharmacist knew the allocation |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | MPH (or matching placebo) powder packaged in gelatin capsules |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All investigators, trial co‐ordinators, teachers, parents and children were blinded to treatment assignments |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Statistical analyses were performed according to the ITT principle, and last available observations were carried forward and imputed when needed for both efficacy and safety measures. However, only data from the ADHD‐RS for children who completed the titration period were analysed Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion): no |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No indication of selective reporting |