Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 27;2023(3):CD009885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub3

Tannock 1995b.

Study characteristics
Methods Cross‐over trial with 4 interventions:
  • MPH (0.3 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg)

  • placebo


Phases: washout, baseline, trial
2 groups, ADHD and ADHD + anxiety ‐ were subjected to the same trial
Participants Number of participants screened: 50
Number of participants included: 40 (34 boys, 6 girls)
Number of participants followed up: 40
Number of withdrawals: none
Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐III‐R (no subtype)
Age: ADHD mean 9.4; ADHD + anxiety mean 9.1 (range 7‐11 years);
IQ: > 80
MPH‐naive: not stated
Ethnicity: white (90%), African American or Asian (10%)
Country: Canada
Setting: outpatient clinic
Comorbidity (type: overanxious 27.5%, separation anxiety 5%, over anxiety and separation anxiety 10%, avoidant disorder with overanxious traits 2.5%, ODD 55%, CD 10%)
Comedication: not stated
Other sociodemographics: predominantly from middle‐class families
Inclusion criteria
  • Meeting DSM‐III‐R criteria

  • At least 2 of the following

    • ≥ 15 on the Conners' Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire

    • ≥ 4 inattentive, 4 impulsive and 3 hyperactive symptoms rated as "pretty much" or "very much" on SNAP Questionnaire

    • Score of 5 or 6 on the Hyperactivity factor of the Rutter Child Scales


Exclusion criteria
  • Full scale IQ < 80

  • Evidence of major neurological, physical or sensory impairment

  • Medical or neurological contraindications for stimulant medication

  • Not knowing the number facts of 10. Needing to use concrete materials (i.e. fingers) to add numbers


Inclusion criteria for the ADHD + anxiety group
≥ 1 of the following
  • DSM‐III‐R criteria for overanxious, separation anxiety or avoidant disorder based on parent interview

  • Score > 1 SD above the mean for age and sex on the Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale

  • Score > 1 SD for age and sex on the Trait Scale‐C2 of the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children


Children in the ADHD group did not meet any of these criteria for anxiety
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 12 possible drug condition orders of 0.3 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg or 0.9 mg/kg MPH and placebo
Mean MPH dosage: 0.3 mg/kg = 8.75 (± 2.2); 0.6 mg/kg = 17.75 (± 4.2); 0.9 mg/kg = 27.25 (± 5.6)
Administration schedule: once/d
Duration of each medication condition: 1 day
Washout before trial initiation: 48 h when applicable
Medication‐free period between interventions: not stated
Titration period: no, but there was a 1‐day open trial on 0.3 mg/kg before proceeding to ascertain tolerance
Treatment compliance: medication was administered at the laboratory
Outcomes Non‐serious AEs
  • Heart rate and radial pulse, once at baseline and 3 times during each session

Notes Sample calculation: not stated
Ethics approval: not stated
Key conclusion of trial authors
  • "High levels of trait anxiety in children with ADHD predict poor (but not adverse) response to methylphenidate in terms of working memory, and add to growing evidence that ADHD with anxiety constitutes a distinct and clinically meaningful subtype of ADHD."


Comment from review authors
  • Main trial was preceded by a 1‐day trial of the lowest dose to assess tolerance to MPH


Inclusion of MPH responders only/exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH before randomisation: yes; see above
Any withdrawals due to AEs: no
Funding: in part by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and the National Health Research and Development Program, Health Canada
Email correspondence with trial authors: June 2014. Emailed trial authors twice to request supplemental information/data but have received no response.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Drug order was counterbalanced and determined by random assignment, such that an approximately equal number of children were assigned to each of 12 possible orders
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Active medication and placebo were prepared by the hospital pharmacy, packaged in identical opaque gelatin capsules and administered in a double‐blind manner
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No dropouts
Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): 1‐day open trial to assess tolerance before main trial, but no children were excluded
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes are reported