Tannock 1995b.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Cross‐over trial with 4 interventions:
Phases: washout, baseline, trial 2 groups, ADHD and ADHD + anxiety ‐ were subjected to the same trial |
|
Participants | Number of participants screened: 50 Number of participants included: 40 (34 boys, 6 girls) Number of participants followed up: 40 Number of withdrawals: none Diagnosis of ADHD: DSM‐III‐R (no subtype) Age: ADHD mean 9.4; ADHD + anxiety mean 9.1 (range 7‐11 years); IQ: > 80 MPH‐naive: not stated Ethnicity: white (90%), African American or Asian (10%) Country: Canada Setting: outpatient clinic Comorbidity (type: overanxious 27.5%, separation anxiety 5%, over anxiety and separation anxiety 10%, avoidant disorder with overanxious traits 2.5%, ODD 55%, CD 10%) Comedication: not stated Other sociodemographics: predominantly from middle‐class families Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria for the ADHD + anxiety group ≥ 1 of the following
Children in the ADHD group did not meet any of these criteria for anxiety |
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 12 possible drug condition orders of 0.3 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg or 0.9 mg/kg MPH and placebo Mean MPH dosage: 0.3 mg/kg = 8.75 (± 2.2); 0.6 mg/kg = 17.75 (± 4.2); 0.9 mg/kg = 27.25 (± 5.6) Administration schedule: once/d Duration of each medication condition: 1 day Washout before trial initiation: 48 h when applicable Medication‐free period between interventions: not stated Titration period: no, but there was a 1‐day open trial on 0.3 mg/kg before proceeding to ascertain tolerance Treatment compliance: medication was administered at the laboratory |
|
Outcomes |
Non‐serious AEs
|
|
Notes | Sample calculation: not stated Ethics approval: not stated Key conclusion of trial authors
Comment from review authors
Inclusion of MPH responders only/exclusion of MPH non‐responders/children who have previously experienced AEs while taking MPH before randomisation: yes; see above Any withdrawals due to AEs: no Funding: in part by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and the National Health Research and Development Program, Health Canada Email correspondence with trial authors: June 2014. Emailed trial authors twice to request supplemental information/data but have received no response. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Drug order was counterbalanced and determined by random assignment, such that an approximately equal number of children were assigned to each of 12 possible orders |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Active medication and placebo were prepared by the hospital pharmacy, packaged in identical opaque gelatin capsules and administered in a double‐blind manner |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Double‐blind |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No dropouts Selection bias (e.g. titration after randomisation → exclusion of MPH non‐responders or placebo responders): 1‐day open trial to assess tolerance before main trial, but no children were excluded |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes are reported |