Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;2016(3):CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub3

Comparison 4. Subgroup by treatment provider.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Cessation at longest follow‐up 53   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Usual care provider 9 5112 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.03 [1.70, 2.43]
1.2 Specialist cessation provider 39 12252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.81 [1.64, 1.99]
1.3 Peer supporter 2 799 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.75 [1.19, 2.58]
1.4 Lay health adviser 1 302 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 28.46 [1.71, 474.46]
1.5 Mail contact only 1 1023 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.69, 1.58]
1.6 Lung Health Study (specialist) 1 5887 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.88 [3.35, 4.50]