Lung Health Study.
Methods | Setting: 10 study centres, USA Recruitment: Healthy smokers with mild airway obstruction, not required to be interested in quitting | |
Participants | 5887 smokers; 37% F, av. age 48, av. cpd 31 Providers: specialist counsellors |
|
Interventions | 1. Advice from study physician with stress on high risk of COPD, 12 group sessions over 10 weeks, beginning on quit day, initially 4 sessions/week, 2 mg nicotine gum available for 6 months, maintenance and recycling sessions offered long term. Cessation intervention participants also randomized to bronchodilator or placebo arms, pooled here. 2. Usual Care, no intervention | |
Outcomes | Abstinence at 1 year (PP) (also assessed annually for 5 years, data not used here) Validation: CO at each visit, cotinine at 1y | |
Notes | Numbers quit at 1y estimated from graph. At 5y sustained abstinence rates reported to be approximately 22% vs 5% | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomized, computer generated separately for each centre, blocks of random permutations of varied length (Reported in Connett 1993) |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Centralised verification of eligibility & allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | ˜95% follow‐up at 1y. Non attenders counted as smokers |