Rodriguez 2003.
Methods | Setting: 3 worksites, Spain. Recruitment: at annual medical check‐up, motivated to quit smoking | |
Participants | 218 smokers; 86% M, av. age 43 Provider: occupational physician |
|
Interventions | 1. Intervention: 5‐8 mins structured counselling + further contacts at 2 days, 15 days & 3m. NRT based on Fagerstrom score; < 5 counselling only; 5‐7 8 wks x14 mg nicotine patch; > 7 4 wks x 21 mg, 4wks x 14mg, 4wks x 7mg. Could be increased if necessary. 2. Control: minimal (30‐60 secs) sporadic unstructured advice, usually at annual medical check up | |
Outcomes | Continuous abstinence (7 day PP at each assessment) at 12m. Validation: expired CO <= 10 ppm at each assessment | |
Notes | Control group participants also contacted at 2 & 15 days and most appear to have also made quit attempts. Classified as moderate treatment take‐up | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Numbered sealed opaque envelopes, opened after enrolment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 1 death in intervention group excluded from denominator, no other reported losses to follow‐up |