Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Oct 4;50(2):387–397. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05972-w

Fig 3.

Fig 3.

Calibration graphs in women and men showing predicted probability of CAD compared to actual prevalence of CAD. Calibration in women was best for Model 3, with both Model 2 and Model 3 having significantly better calibration than Model 1 (both p<0.001). Calibration was similar for all models in men.