Abstract
Asthma, a common chronic respiratory illness is mostly managed in primary care. We aimed to determine healthcare resources, organisational support, and doctors’ practice in managing asthma in a Malaysian primary care setting. A total of six public health clinics participated. We found four clinics had dedicated asthma services. There was only one clinic which had a tracing defaulter system. Long-term controller medications were available in all clinics, but not adequately provided. Resources, educational materials, and equipment for asthma management were present, though restricted in number and not placed in main locations of the clinic. To diagnose asthma, most doctors used clinical judgement and peak flow metre measurements with reversibility test. Although spirometry is recommended to diagnose asthma, it was less practiced, being inaccessible and unskilled in using as the main reasons. Most doctors reported providing asthma self-management; asthma action plan, but for only half of the patients that they encountered. In conclusion, there is still room for improvement in the provision of clinic resources and support for asthma care. Utilising peak flow metre measurement and reversibility test suggest practical alternative in low resource for spirometry. Reinforcing education on asthma action plan is vital to ensure optimal asthma care.
Subject terms: Health services, Asthma
Introduction
Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory illness affecting an estimated 262 million people worldwide1. In Malaysia, the prevalence is estimated between 8.9 and 13.0% in children2,3 and 6.3% in adults4. Despite evidence-based asthma management recommendations and treatments, asthma control is still suboptimal. A recent local study showed only 37% had well-controlled asthma, 36% were partly controlled and 27% uncontrolled5. Primary care is ideally placed to diagnose, manage and provide continuous care to patients with asthma6,7. Important factors that have been reported to facilitate improvement in primary care management of asthma include availability of good organisational support and access to resources within the practice, as well as having a dedicated asthma team (doctors, pharmacists, nurses, allied health professional trained in asthma)8. However, it is not clear to what degree these factors are being provided to facilitate asthma management in our Malaysian primary care setting. We therefore aimed to determine current resources available, organisational support and doctors’ provision of asthma care in our public health clinics. The findings will help inform strategies to improve the delivery of asthma care in our setting.
Methods
Study design, setting and participants
This is a cross-sectional survey conducted from December 2019 to January 2020 in six public health clinics in Klang District, Malaysia. Malaysia has a dual-sector healthcare system: public and private sectors9. The public health clinics are government-funded with heavily subsidised in which patient pays MYR1 (USD0.24) per clinic visit that covers the cost of consultation, investigations, and medications while government employees, pensioners, school-going children and people aged 60 years and above receive free health services10. On the other hand, the private health clinics operate on a fee for service9. The Klang District has mainly a low-middle socioeconomic class population and chronic disease care is mainly provided from public health clinics11. Every public health clinic is led by Family Medicine Specialists, and are staffed by various healthcare providers: doctors, nurses, pharmacists, medical assistants and lab technicians. There were nine Family Medicine Specialists and 107 doctors at the time of study, all of whom were invited to participate. Written informed consent was obtained from every participant prior to carrying out the study.
Sampling method
The six clinics were purposively sampled to define characteristics that address the settings of low-middle income demographic. The characteristics of these clinics include government-subsidised and catered for a population which, majority were from low-middle income socio-economic groups. The size of population served by each clinic ranged from 82,000 to 156,672 people. Klang District is one of the most densely populated districts in Malaysia12.
Data collection
We used a self-administered questionnaire to collect the data. The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review, training module on asthma for healthcare providers at the primary care level in Malaysia13 and the views of an expert panel comprising a team of Family Medicine Specialists, respiratory physicians, and academicians in primary care medicine. Component 1 of the questionnaire includes questions on healthcare resources, clinic organisation as well as asthma services and treatment, which includes the availability of emergency care, training on asthma for healthcare providers, frequency of asthma clinical audits and availability of asthma medications. The number of resources and equipment available in designated areas in the clinic related to asthma was also collected. The questionnaire for Component 2 asked about the doctors’ current practice on asthma management including number of years in service, number of patients with asthma seen in a month, tools used to diagnose asthma, use of spirometry, peak flow metre and asthma guidelines. The questionnaire was given to six Family Medicine Specialists, two respiratory physicians and five doctors to ensure its face and content validity and underwent a series of revisions where items were evaluated for clarity, easy comprehension, and formatting. The layout of the clinic areas was checked by the researchers prior to this study to better understand the availability of current resources and organisational support. This includes the layout of consultation rooms, treatment rooms (for nebulisation, immunisation, wound dressing), emergency room, pharmacy, laboratory, meeting room and room for continuous medical education (CME).
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 25.0. Descriptive statistics were used, where data were described using frequencies and percentages for categorical variables or means with standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables.
Ethical approval
We obtained ethical approval from the National Medical Research Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health, Malaysia (NMRR-18-2707-42719) and sponsor approval from the Academic and Clinical Central Office for Research and Development, University of Edinburgh United Kingdom (AC19040).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Results
Component 1: healthcare resources and organisational support in asthma management
All data collected for Component 1 were captured objectively from patient registries, existing available clinic infrastructure and resources; and were reported by the Family Medicine Specialists from the six public health clinics. Table 1 summarises the provision and availability of healthcare resources and organisational support in asthma management. The average number of patients with asthma registered in each clinic ranged from 100 to 311 for adults and 30 to 100 for children and adolescents (less than 18 years old). However, two clinics reported they did not have registries for children or adolescents with asthma at the time of data collection. Most practices had dedicated asthma clinics which operated once a week or once a fortnight. These dedicated asthma clinics were run by trained healthcare personnel. An asthma appointment system was available in five clinics; however, only one had a system for tracing or recalling patients who defaulted follow-up. To enhance patients’ adherence to treatment, four clinics had initiated an Asthma Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (MTAC) run mainly by pharmacists. Oral corticosteroids for acute attacks and long-term controller medications, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and combination of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) were available but inadequate in quantities to meet the demand in the clinics. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) were not available in any of the clinics. All clinics have a Critical Care Patient Escort and Retrieval Team (CPERT) system, which had been implemented to facilitate immediate referral of emergency cases to the tertiary centre when this system is activated. CPERT is a system unique to the district of Klang, Malaysia.
Table 1.
Healthcare resources and organisational support in asthma management in the six public health clinics (N = 6).
1. Organisation of asthma services | |
Total number of patients in each clinic (N) | (Adult/children & adolescents) |
Clinic 1 | 240/not available |
Clinic 2 | 288/not available |
Clinic 3 | 300/100 |
Clinic 4 | 237/50 |
Clinic 5 | 100/30 |
Clinic 6 | 311/32 |
Availability of dedicated asthma clinic | 4 clinics |
Frequency of asthma clinic being held | Once a week or once every 2 weeks |
Availability of asthma team | 5 clinics |
Comprises of Family Medicine Specialists (FMS), doctors, nurses, pharmacists and medical assistants (MA) |
For each asthma team: -All 5 clinics have *FMS (n = 1 or 2), doctors (n = 2) and nurses (n = 2). -4 clinics have pharmacists (n = 1) -3 clinics have medical assistants (n = 1) |
Received formal asthma training | All healthcare personnel in the asthma team |
Availability of asthma appointment system | 5 clinics |
Availability of defaulter tracing or recall system | 1 clinic |
Availability of Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (MTAC)# programme for asthma | 4 clinics |
Number of patients with asthma registered in past year, mean (range) | 35 (1–110) |
Proportion of patients with asthma (%) provided with asthma record book, mean (range) | 57 (40–100) |
Healthcare personnel who carried out assessment of asthma control |
All doctors in all clinics Nurses and pharmacists in 3 clinics |
2. Emergency care | |
Availability of emergency medications | |
Hydrocortisone, Prednisolone, Adrenaline, Salbutamol nebulised, Salbutamol/ipratropium nebulised | All clinics |
Availability of ambulance services | All clinics |
Availability of Critical Care Patient Escort and Retrieval Team (CPERT)§ system | All clinics |
3. Availability of long-term asthma treatment | |
Availability of asthma medications | |
1. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) | All clinics |
Supply adequate? | Yes |
2. Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonist (LABA)/ Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) (Seretide and Symbicort) | All clinics |
Supply adequate? | No |
3. Theophylline | All clinics |
Supply adequate? | Yes |
4. Leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) | Not available |
4. Asthma training and audit | |
Availability of asthma training (course/workshop) | All clinics |
Frequency/year (range) | 1–3 times/year |
Availability of clinic audit for asthma care | All clinics |
Frequency/year (range) | 1–12 times/year |
Availability of national-level Quality Assurance+ for asthma | All clinics |
Frequency/year (range) | 1 time/year |
#MTAC Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic—introduced in Malaysia in 2004 as a component of ambulatory care, with the aim to improve patient adherence to medication.
§CPERT Critical Care Patient Escort and Retrieval Team system to facilitate immediate referral of emergency cases to tertiary centre when this system is activated.
+Quality Assurance are measures taken by the specific practice to ensure the quality of care for patients with asthma are standardised throughout the practice, especially when involving many different doctors treating the patients.
*Three clinics have 2 FMSs and another two clinics have 1 FMS each.
All six clinics have about similar layout. Each clinic has between 10 and 20 consultation rooms, one emergency room, one pharmacy and one consultation room for pharmacist, and one treatment room. Tables 2 and 3 summarise the total number of clinics with resources, educational materials and equipment for asthma and its availability in specified clinic rooms. Figures 1 and 2 demonstrate the availability of resources, education materials and equipment in the specified clinic rooms (consultation rooms, emergency rooms, pharmacies and treatment rooms). All clinics reported to have asthma care pathway and asthma treatment protocols, written asthma action plans, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) reference chart, children&rsqio;s growth chart, peak flow metres, pulse oximeters, nebulisers, oxygen supply and placebo inhalers. Although the resources, educational materials and equipment were provided in all clinics, the availability and placement of them varied. The clinics often had the materials and equipment they need, but not necessarily in the right places. Spacers were available in four clinics, and one clinic had handheld spirometry. Only three clinics had patient education leaflets for asthma.
Table 2.
Total number of clinics with resources and educational materials for asthma and its availability in specified clinic rooms.
Resources and education materials | Asthma care pathway protocol | Asthma treatment protocol | Written AAP | PEFR reference chart | *Patient education leaflet | Growth chart for children |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Availability in clinics (N = 6) | All clinics | All clinics | All clinics | All clinics | 3 clinics | All clinics |
Consultation room | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Emergency room | √ | √ | √ | |||
Pharmacy | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
Treatment room | √ | √ | √ |
AAP asthma action plan, PEFR peak expiratory flow rate.
*Patient education leaflet on asthma can be accessed from the Malaysia Ministry of Health website:
Table 3.
Total number of clinics with equipment for asthma and its availability in specified clinic rooms.
Equipment | Handheld spirometry | Peak flow metre | Pulse oximeter | Nebuliser | Oxygen | Placebo inhaler | Spacer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Availability in clinics N = 6 |
1 clinic | All clinics | All clinics | All clinics | All clinics | All clinics | 4 clinics |
Consultation room | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Emergency room | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Pharmacy | √ | √ | √ | ||||
Treatment room | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Fig. 1. The total number of resources and education materials available in specified clinic rooms (consultation room, emergency room, pharmacy and treatment room) in all clinics.
PEFR peak expiratory flow rate.
Fig. 2.
The total number of equipment for asthma available in specified clinic rooms (consultation room, emergency room, pharmacy and treatment room) in all clinics.
Component 2: doctors’ practice on asthma
A total of 107 doctors were invited to participate, however only 100 completed questionnaires were returned (94% response rate). Table 4 summarises the doctors’ profile and how long they had been managing asthma. The average number of patients with asthma seen in a month was 19, most of whom they diagnosed by clinical assessment and peak flow metre measurements; with 65% of the doctors experienced carrying out a reversibility test with a peak flow metre. Only 18% used spirometry to diagnose asthma. The main reason for poor usage of spirometry was a lack of accessibility and familiarity. Peak flow rate was mainly assessed and documented during routine follow-up, and only about two-thirds of the doctors carried out peak flow assessment during unscheduled visits (potentially for an attack). History and examination (84%) and GINA assessment of asthma control (80%) were the main strategies for assessing asthma control. Most reported providing asthma action plans during consultations, though not to all the patients that they reviewed.
Table 4.
Profile of doctors and their asthma practice (N = 100).
Profile | n (%) |
---|---|
Number of years working as a doctor, mean (SD) | 10.1 (4.2) |
Number of years working in primary care clinic, mean (SD) | 6.0 (4.1) |
Number of patients with asthma seen in a month, mean (range) | 19 (1–80) |
Methods used to diagnose asthma | |
Clinical (History and physical examination) | 96 (96.0) |
Peak flow metre | 84 (84.0) |
Spirometry | 18 (18.0) |
Chest X-ray | 5 (5.0) |
Other (family history, oxygen saturation levels) | 2 (2.0) |
Number of doctors who had used spirometry to diagnose asthma: | 18 (18.0) |
If NOT, why | |
Lack of accessibility | 80 (80.0) |
Lack of familiarity | 20 (20.0) |
Do not know how to interpret | 10 (10.0) |
Costly | 4 (4.0) |
Number of doctors who have carried out peak flow metre and reversibility test to diagnose asthma | 65 (65.0) |
Commonly peak flow expiratory rate (PEFR) measurement was carried out during | |
Follow-up | 96 (96.0) |
Acute exacerbation | 60 (60.0) |
Walk-in | 57 (57.0) |
Number of doctors who reported prescribing asthma action plans | 91 (91.0) |
Mean (SD) | 5.71 (3.46) |
Main tool used for the assessment of asthma control | |
History and examination | 84 (84.0) |
Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines | 80 (80.0) |
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) | 77 (77.0) |
Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Asthma | 46 (46.0) |
Asthma Control Test (ACT) | 35 (35.0) |
Asthma Control Questionnaires (ACQ) | 11 (11.0) |
Main asthma management guidelines used | |
Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines | 96 (96.0) |
Malaysian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Asthma | 63 (63.0) |
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline | 8 (8.0) |
Discussion
This study indicates there is room for improvement in the existing healthcare resources, organisational support and practices on asthma care. Four of the six clinics had dedicated asthma services run by teams of trained healthcare personnel. Five clinics had appointment systems for registered patients with asthma, however, only one clinic had a defaulter tracing system. All clinics had satisfactory provision of charts, tools, and equipment (e.g., peak flow metre, pulse oximeter, nebuliser machines) appropriate for asthma management, however, the availability in specified clinic rooms varied and appeared not to be readily available in important areas for use when needed during consultation or emergency care. Long-term controller medications for asthma for example ICS and combination ICS/LABA were available, though the latter were not adequately provided. To enhance compliance, four clinics had implemented a Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (MTAC) programme for asthma run by pharmacists. Clinical assessment and peak flow readings appeared to be the main methods used to diagnose asthma, with more than half of the doctors surveyed reported conducting reversibility testing with peak flow metre. Only a minority had used spirometry, mainly due to lack of accessibility. Asthma action plans were still under-prescribed.
Primary care settings are ideally placed to identify and manage patients with asthma. We found four of the six clinics provided dedicated asthma clinics, run by the Family Medicine Specialists, doctors, nurses and pharmacists who were trained in asthma care. Although, the outcome of dedicated asthma services has yet to be explored in the Malaysian primary care, a Cochrane review including studies from high-income countries like the United Kingdom and Australia reported promising results14. Asthma management provided by dedicated asthma clinics was associated with reduced emergency visits15 and improved asthma control in Sweden and the United Kingdom16. Our study found only one clinic reported using a defaulter tracing system, despite evidences from earlier local studies in Malaysia and Korea that showed this system improved adherence on scheduled visits17,18, and reduced unscheduled visits for acute exacerbations18. Implementing a defaulter tracing system in our primary care setting is important to facilitate attendances of follow-up clinics as only one-third of patients with asthma attended routine follow-up care2,19. Resources, educational material, and equipment for asthma for example, asthma care and treatment protocols, asthma action plans, PEFR reference charts and patient education leaflets are important to assist and facilitate healthcare providers in the clinic when managing asthma. We found some of these, including asthma action plans, were not available in important clinic areas such as the emergency rooms, consultation rooms, and pharmacies. A previous local qualitative study found the main reasons for this were budget constraints and lack of prioritisation20. Another local study documented adequate numbers of peak flow metres and PEFR reference charts provided in the clinic, however, there was no spacer or placebo inhalers available for teaching patients21. Readily available asthma protocols and charts in specific clinic areas (e.g., consultation or emergency rooms) would help healthcare providers on consultation and treatment decisions.
Asthma diagnosis remains a challenge, because of its variability in nature22. The GINA guidelines recommend the use of spirometry as a tool to assess lung function23, but this assumes that spirometry is accessible, feasible and affordable in practice—which we found was not the case in any of our clinics. Studies conducted in Western countries found that accessibility was not the major issue, but rather underutilisation was due to lack of education and awareness of spirometer use and difficulties in interpreting the results24–28. Lack of confidence in use and interpretation was also reported a barrier in our study. One study reported the reason for underutilisation of spirometry testing was patient’s unwillingness to undergo the test due to time constraint29. A primary care study echoed our findings that a clinical history supported by peak flow rate assessment of variability was the main strategy to arrive at a diagnosis of probable asthma30. This could be a pragmatic approach to diagnosing asthma in primary care in limited resource settings but further evidence on the accuracy of this approach is needed.
There was inadequate availability of long-term controller medications specifically ICS/LABA inhalers in our health clinics, which limit the supply to only a few of the patients with poorly controlled asthma, and under the provision of asthma action plans—a challenge shared with other countries31–33. The healthcare providers, especially those involved in dedicated asthma services, had attended asthma training, carried out regular asthma audits and performed quality assurance programmes, however, the effectiveness and impact of these activities on practice to improve asthma care has yet to be explored. Existing studies have documented inconsistencies of clinic practices and skill-based trainings21,34,35.
This study highlights the gaps in resources, organisation, and practice, currently present in asthma care in our primary care setting. We suggest the following list of improvements in the delivery and organisation of asthma management:
-
i.
Increase accessibility to spirometry. Correct asthma diagnosis is important for appropriate management; thus, it is important that spirometry and training in its use - is accessible in primary care settings. Currently spirometry is only provided at tertiary centres conducted by personnel certified by the Malaysian Thoracic Society36, so peak flow rate measurement is the main tool used to diagnose asthma in our low-resource primary care settings.
-
ii.
Use of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and reversibility test. In the absence of spirometry due to resource constraints, PEFR and reversibility test can be used as a pragmatic tool to diagnose asthma. Several studies have suggested serial PEFR over a 2–4-week period to assess the amplitude of airway variability more than 20% to support the diagnosis of asthma, with the important caveat that lack of PEFR variability does not rule out asthma (because of natural variability in asthma control)6,23,37. Interpretation should always be supported by typical history of probable asthma38–40. If clinical history and PEFR are used as diagnostic tool, suggestions on the diagnostic algorithm and continuous medical education are needed on technique, interpretation, validity and limitations of use to support implementation40. Despite being available for many years, more evidence is needed to support the practical use of PEFR reversibility testing and serial PEFR in diagnosing asthma.
-
iii.
Implement a defaulter tracing system. To optimise patients’ adherence to follow-up asthma care, a defaulter tracing system should be in place to complement the existing appointment-based system. Several studies have shown regular asthma follow-up reduces the risk of exacerbation17–19. The use of telemedicine has a potential to improve follow-up care in asthma and asthma control41.
-
iv.
Develop an ‘asthma care kit’—a package to assist healthcare providers. An asthma care kit that comprises of asthma education, assessment tools and treatment pathway protocols for both scheduled and unscheduled visits could potentially assist healthcare providers when reviewing patients. The ‘asthma care kit’ should be placed and easily reached by healthcare providers in all consultation and emergency rooms. There are promising results from implementation of an asthma care package in improving practice and patients outcomes42,43.
-
v.
Upskill healthcare providers on asthma diagnosis, treatment and communication skills, particularly on asthma self-management. This can be done through regular audits, training and educational programmes. The evidence-based practice which includes asthma self-management44,45 needs to be encouraged, and long-term controller medications23 should be made accessible to enhance doctors’ practice in the treatment of poorly controlled asthma.
The strength of this study was the response rate of 94% was excellent. Nevertheless, several limitations were identified. Reasons behind the identified gaps in care were not explored; this includes an unavailable defaulter tracing system, inadequate provision of ICS/LABA in clinics, and variation in the number of resources, equipment and materials for asthma in the specified clinic rooms. This could be explored further qualitatively. In addition, only Family Medicine Specialists and the doctors were invited to participate in the survey because they were the most involved in asthma care at the time of data collection. The Family Medicine Specialists led and organised asthma care in the clinic. Diagnosing asthma, assessing asthma control, prescribing, and counselling were mainly carried out by the doctors.
It would have added value if other healthcare providers (e.g., nurses and pharmacists) completed the survey. In addition, it was a self-reported questionnaire; doctors’ actual practice in patients’ clinical records was not evaluated to observe the match between reported and actual practice.
This study has demonstrated opportunities to further improve the provision of healthcare resources, organisational support, educational materials, and equipment for asthma in our primary care setting. Spirometry was rarely utilised in asthma diagnosis as compared to the use of peak flow measurements with reversibility testing, suggesting that this is a practical alternative to spirometry in a low-resource setting. Reinforcing education on asthma action plan deserves to be addressed to ensure asthma care is optimised.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The RESPIRE collaboration comprises the UK Grant holders, Partners and research teams as listed on the RESPIRE website (www.ed.ac.uk/usher/respire), including Ahmad Ihsan Abu Bakar, Bee Kiau Ho, Salbiah Mohamad Isa, Harzana Harun, Izan Ishak, Zuzana Aman, Asnita Nordin, Siow Foon Tan, Pang Yong Kek, Asiah Kassim and Sian Williams. The authors would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for the permission to publish this paper. This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit on Respiratory Health (RESPIRE). The funder played no role in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript.
Author contributions
All authors have made contributions to the work in conceptualisation, conception, design of work and analysis. NH and JP wrote the original draft, and all authors reviewed and edited critically for intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
The authors E.M.K., P.Y.L., A.T.C. and H.P. declare no competing non-financial interests but the following competing financial interests: E.M.K., P.Y.L., A.T.C. and H.P. declare grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Unit on Respiratory Health (RESPIRE). E.M.K. reports grants from Seqirus UK; consulting fees from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; and is the board director of the International Primary Care Respiratory Group. E.M.K. and H.P. are associate editors for npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. E.M.K. and H.P. were not involved in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to, this manuscript. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41533-023-00337-8.
References
- 1.Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ahad A, Khoo EM. Asthma control and care among Malaysian primary school children: a cross-sectional study. Asia-Pac. J. Public Health. 2017;29:422–429. doi: 10.1177/1010539517717766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pearce N, et al. Worldwide trends in the prevalence of asthma symptoms: phase III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Thorax. 2007;62:757–765. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.070169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chan YY, et al. Lifestyle, chronic diseases and self-rated health among Malaysian adults: results from the 2011 National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) BMC Public Health. 2015;15:754. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2080-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hussein N, et al. Primary care management of asthma in Malaysia: findings of the Klang Asthma Cohort Study. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;56:3258. [Google Scholar]
- 6.British Thoracic Society. Sign 158: British guideline on the management of asthma—a national clinical guideline. https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/guidelines/asthma/btssign-guideline-for-the-management-of-asthma-2019/ (2019).
- 7.Reddel HK, Sawyer SM, Everett PW, Flood PV, Peters MJ. Asthma control in Australia: a cross-sectional web-based survey in a nationally representative population. Med J. Aust. 2015;202:492–496. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fletcher MJ, et al. Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works? NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 2020;30:29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0184-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hwong, W. Y. et al. National Healthcare Establishment & Workforce Statistics (Primary Care) (National Clinical Research Centre, 2012).
- 10.Fadzil F, Jaafar S, Ismail R. 40 years of Alma Ata Malaysia: targeting equitable access through organisational and physical adaptations in the delivery of public sector primary care. Prim. Health Care Res Dev. 2020;24:e4. doi: 10.1017/S146342362000002X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lim HM, Sivasampu S, Khoo EM, Mohamad Noh K. Chasm in primary care provision in a universal health system: Findings from a nationally representative survey of health facilities in Malaysia. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Department of Statistics Malaysia. My Local Stats Selangor. https://www.dosm.gov.my (2021).
- 13.Training module for health care providers. Management of asthma at primary care level. http://jknj.moh.gov.my/ncd/latihanpengurusan/cpg/Asthma%20FINAL.pdf (2021).
- 14.Baishnab, E. & Karner, C. Primary care based clinics for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Lisspers K, et al. Organisation of asthma care in primary health care in Mid-Sweden. Prim. Care Respir. J. 2005;14:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gibeon D, et al. British Thoracic Society Difficult Asthma Network. Dedicated severe asthma services improve health-care use and quality of life. Chest. 2015;148:870–876. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-3056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abdullah Z, et al. Issues and challenges in implementing care coordinator in primary healthcare in malaysia: a qualitative study. J. Prim. Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720956478. doi: 10.1177/2150132720956478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park HJ, et al. Regular follow-up visits reduce the risk for asthma exacerbation requiring admission in Korean adults with asthma. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2018;10:29. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0250-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.The Third National Health And Morbidity Survey (NHMS III). https://iku.moh.gov.my/images/IKU/Document/REPORT/2006/Asthma.pdf (2006).
- 20.Lee PY, et al. Barriers to implementing asthma self-management in Malaysian primary care: qualitative study exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals. NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 2021;31:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00250-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tohid H, et al. Quality of asthma care at a university-based primary care clinic in Malaysia: an audit of process, structure and outcomes. J. Heal Res. 2019;33:425–434. doi: 10.1108/JHR-11-2018-0148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCormack MC, Enright PL. Making the diagnosis of asthma. Respir. Care. 2008;53:583–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. www.ginaasthma.org (2022).
- 24.Hueto J, et al. Spirometry in primary care in Navarre, Spain. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2006;42:326–331. doi: 10.1157/13090582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weidinger P, Nilsson LG, Lindblad U. Adherence to diagnostic guidelines and quality indicators in asthma and COPD in Swedish primary care. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2009;18:393–400. doi: 10.1002/pds.1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Barton C, et al. Management of asthma in Australian general practice: care is still not in line with clinical practice guidelines. Prim. Care Respir. J. 2009;18:100–105. doi: 10.3132/pcrj.2008.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johns DP, Burton D, Walters JAE, Wood-Baker R. National survey of spirometer ownership and usage in general practice in Australia. Respirology. 2006;11:292–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2006.00851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Heffler E, et al. Misdiagnosis of asthma and COPD and underuse of spirometry in primary care unselected patients. Respir. Med. 2018;142:48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dennis SM, Zwar NA, Marks GB. Diagnosing asthma in adults in primary care: a qualitative study of Australian GPs’ experiences. Prim. Care Respir. J. 2010;19:52–56. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Akindele A, Daines L, Cavers D, Pinnock H, Sheikh A. Qualitative study of practices and challenges when making a diagnosis of asthma in primary care. NPJ Prim. Care Respir. Med. 2019;29:27. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0140-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zainudin BMZ, Lai CK, Soriano JB, Jia-Horng W, De Guia TS. Asthma control in adults in Asia-Pacific (AIRIAP) Steering Committee. Respirology. 2005;10:579–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2005.00753.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lai CK, et al. Asthma control in the Asia-Pacific region: the asthma insights and reality in Asia-Pacific study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003;111:263–268. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chung LP, Johnson P, Summers Q. Models of care for severe asthma: the role of primary care. Med J. Aust. 2018;209:34–40. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pinnock H, Hoskins G, Smith B, Weller T, Price D. A pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of undertaking acute asthma professional development in three different UK primary care settings. Prim. Care Respir. J. 2003;12:7–11. doi: 10.1038/pcrj.2003.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foster JM, et al. Practice development plans to improve the primary care management of acute asthma: randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam. Pr. 2007;8:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Malaysian Thoracic Society. http://www1.mts.org.my (2021).
- 37.Ozturk AB, Kaya Z, Cagatay T, Erkan F. Reliability of peak expiratory flow measurement in assessing bronchodilator response of airflow obstruction. J. Asthma Allergy Educ. 2010;1:150–154. doi: 10.1177/2150129710375613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Louis R, et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults. Eur. Respir. J. 2022;60:2101585. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01585-2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kavanagh J, Jackson DJ, Kent BD. Over-and under-diagnosis in asthma. Breathe. 2018;15:e20–e272019. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0362-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management. NICE guideline. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng80 (2017).
- 41.Chongmelaxme B, et al. The effects of telemedicine on asthma control and patients’ quality of life in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2019;7:199–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Colborn KL, et al. Colorado asthma toolkit implementation improves some process measures of asthma care. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2019;32:37–49. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.180155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rylance S, et al. An enhanced care package to improve asthma management in Malawian children: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2021;76:434–440. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pinnock H, et al. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective. BMC Med. 2017;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hodkinson A, et al. Self-management interventions to reduce healthcare use and improve quality of life among patients with asthma: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;8:2521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.