Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 10;7(2):273–284. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00383-x

Table 3.

Results of scenario analyses

Scenario ICER cost/QALY (¥ [US$a])
NSQ aNSCLC SQ aNSCLC
Base-case ICER 190,919 (28,349) 207,388 (30,794)
1 CheckMate 078 derived utilities using an overall (not treatment-specific) approach that is histology-specific 199,193 (29,578) 215,589 (32,012)
2 Use of CheckMate 017 or CheckMate 057 overall histology-specific utilities 208,822 (31,007) 228,029 (33,859)
3 Alternative PFS and OS parametric curves:
 OS nivolumab: generalised gamma (for NSQ), loglogistic for SQ 181,806 (26,996) 224,006 (33,262)
 OS docetaxel: 1-knot spline normal (for NSQ), loglogistic for SQ 182,775 (27,140) 198,957 (29,543)
 PFS nivolumab: 1-knot spline hazard (for NSQ), 2-knot hazard spline (for SQ) 185,714 (27,576) 211,432 (31,395)
 PFS docetaxel: Log normal (for NSQ), 2-knot hazard spline (for SQ) 189,451 (28,131) 207,480 (30,808)
4 Reimbursement of nivolumab for the entire extrapolated treatment duration 666,699 (98,996) 682,151 (101,291)
5 2-year maximum treatment duration for docetaxel 193,006 (28,659) 248,950 (36,966)
6 Disease management costs:
+50% 195,240 (28,991) 211,754 (31,443)
−50% 186,599 (27,708) 203,022 (30,146)
7 AE management costs:
+50% 188,435 (27,980) 205,386 (30,497)
− 50% 193,404 (28,718) 209,390 (31,092)

AE adverse event, aNSCLC advanced non-small cell lung cancer, NSQ non-squamous cell carcinoma, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, SQ squamous cell carcinoma

aConversion using exchange rate ¥1 = US$0.148487; May 3, 2019; www.xe.com