Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 14;10:971147. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.971147

Table 1.

Summary of systematic review studies of warm needle acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis.

First author (year) [ref] Data search Number of trials included (total sample size) Intervention Comparator Outcomes Direction of effect* Overall risk of bias of primary studies Methodological quality of SRs (AMSTAR 2) Conclusion (Quote) AEs
Feng (2019) (25) Jun 2018 8 (582) WA WM Total effective rate + Jadad (High) Critically low … positive effective… No
Guo (2018) (26) Oct 2017 11 (930) WA WM (1) Total effective rate (1) + Cochrane ROB (High) Critically low …effective… No
(2) WOMAC (2) +
Lu (2015) (27) Dec 2014 8 (811) WA WM (1) Total effective rate (1) + Jadad (High) Critically low …conclude be an effect... Yes
(2) AEs (2) +
Kong (2019) (28) Mar 2018 21 (1810) WA + WM WM (1) Total effective rate (1) + Cochrane ROB (High) Low … improve the efficiency… No
(2) Pain (VAS) (2) +
(3) WOMAC (3) +
(4) LKSS (4) +
Cao (2019) (29) Mar 2018 9 (807) WA + WM WM Total effective rate + Cochrane ROB (High) Critically low …effect… No
Jun (2022) (12) May 2022 66 (6231) WA orWA + WM WM (1) Total effective rate (1) + Cochrane ROB (High) Moderate …have some distinct advantage… Yes
(2) Pain (2) +/–
(3) Function (3) +/–
(4) QoL (4) +
Jiang (2019) (30) Jul 2018 20 (18 RCT, 2 CCT) (1719) WA + WM WM Total effective rate + Cochrane ROB (High) Critically low …significant effect… Yes
Chen (2019) (31) Jul 2018 19 (1943) WA orWA + WM No limited(TDP, WM) (1) Pain (VAS) (1) + n.r. Critically low …can increase efficacy… No
(2) WOMAC total (2) +
Huang (2021) (32) Feb 2020 18 (1209) WA No limited(AT, EA, Moxa, WM) (1) Total effective rate (1) + Cochrane ROB (High) Low …effective… No
(2) Pain (VAS) (2) +
(3) WOMAC (3) +
Luo (2019) (33) Oct 2017 10 (819) WA No limited (AT, EA, Moxa, WM) Total effective rate + Cochrane ROB (High) Critically low … positive effective… Yes
Jin (2022) (34) Oct 2021 8 (399) WM TCM (1) Total effective rate (1) + Cochrane ROB (High) Low … better overall… efficacy No
(2) Pain (VAS) (2) +
(3) WOMAC (3) +
Li (2021) (35) Dec 2019 17 (1515) WA AT or EA (1) Total effective rate (1) +/– Cochrane ROB (High) Low …superior to EA… Yes
(2) Pain (VAS) (2) –
(3) WOMAC (3) +/–
(4) LKSS (4) –
Zhang (2018) (36) Jun 2018 12 (1176) WA AT or EA (1) Total effective rate (1) + Jadad (High) Critically low …no…significant difference… No
(2) Pain (VAS) (2)–
(3) WOMAC (3) –
(4) LKSS (4) +
Ou (2018) (37) Jul 2017 7 (530) WA AT Total effective rate + Jadad (High) Critically low … positive effective… No
Wu (2016) (38) Nov 2014 11 (772) WA EA (1) Total effective rate (1)– Jadad (High) Critically low … is not superior to that of EA... No
(2) Pain (VAS) (2)–
(3) WOMAC (3)–

AT, acupuncture; AEs, adverse events; CCT, controlled clinical trials; HM, herbal medicine; IA, intra-articular injection; LKSS, Lysholm score; KOA, knee osteoarthritis; n.r., not reported; RCT, randomized controlled trials; ROB, risk of bias; VAS, visual analog scale; WA, warm acupuncture; western medicine; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index.

*Total effective rate = (number of markedly effective cases + number of effective cases)/total cases.

*Relied on the original author’s judgment, (+): overall positive; (−): negative; (+/−): unclear.