1. Summary of methodological quality.
Name of study | Allocat'n generation | Allocat'n concealed | Blinding | Loss to follow up | Attrition rate | Certainty of AD | Comparable severity |
ASM981C2315 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 15.36% | Unclear | Adequate |
ASM981C2316 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 18.42% | Unclear | Unclear |
ASM981C2322 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 10.12% | Unclear | Unclear |
ASM981C2402 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 23.29% | Unclear | Unclear |
Barba 2003 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 7.55% | Unclear | Unclear |
CASM981C1301 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 13.75% | Adequate | Unclear |
CASM981C1303 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 15.61% | Unclear | Unclear |
CASM981C2413 2006 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 27.24% | Unclear | Unclear |
CASM981C2436 2006 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 16.87% | Adequate | Unclear |
CASM981C2442 2006 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 43.5% | Adequate | Unclear |
CASM981CDE10 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 15.76% | Adequate | Unclear |
CASM981CUS03 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 26.89% | Unclear | Unclear |
Eichenfield (a) 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 18.18% | Adequate | Adequate |
Eichenfield (b) 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 13.66% | Adequate | Adequate |
Ho 2003 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 23.66% | Adequate | Adequate |
Kapp 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 27.09% | Adequate | Adequate |
Kaufmann 2006 | Adequate | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 5.56% | Unclear | Adequate |
Kempers 2004 | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | 11.35% | Unclear | Adequate |
Leo 2004 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 0.00% | Adequate | Unclear |
Ling 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 16.33% | Adequate | Unclear |
Luger 2001 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 22.31% | Adequate | Adequate |
Luger 2004 | Adequate | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 41.19% | Adequate | Adequate |
Meurer 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 30.21% | Adequate | Adequate |
Paller (a) 2005 | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | 24.18% | Adequate | Adequate |
Paller (b) 2005 | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Inadequate | 34.96% | Adequate | Adequate |
Paller (c) 2005 | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Inadequate | 21.79% | Adequate | Adequate |
Staab 2005 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Adequate | 19.39% | Adequate | Adequate |
Seigfried 2006 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 21.45% | Adequate | Unclear |
Thaci 2003 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 28.72% | Unclear | Adequate |
Wahn 2002 | Adequate | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 38.26% | Adequate | Adequate |
Whalley 2002 | Unclear | Unclear | Adequate | Inadequate | 36.10% | Adequate | Unclear |