Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005500.pub2

Paller (c) 2005.

Methods Parallel group, investigator blind, active control, multicentre randomised controlled trial
Participants Inclusion criteria: adults (N = 413), mild to very severe eczema (diagnosis criteria: Hanifin and Rajka), age >= 16 years, IGA 2 to 5, TBSA >= 5%. 
 Exclusion criteria: use nonsteroidal immunosuppressants, light therapy, systemic and topical corticosteroids, topical H1 & H2 antihistamines, topical antimicrobials. 
 Wash out period: four weeks.
Interventions pimecrolimus 1.0% BID (n = 203) vs. tacrolimus 0.1% BID (n = 210) for 6 weeks
Outcomes 1. Efficacy: number of participants achieving clear or almost clear eczema (IGA); median percentage (%) of reduction in EASI from baseline; mean percentage (%) of reduction in BSA 
 2. Safety and tolerability: total WDs; WDs due to lack of efficacy; WDs due to ADEs; numbers of participants have: any adverse event, skin infection, bacterial skin infection, viral skin infection, and skin burning
Notes This paper reports separate data for three trials.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate