Table 3.
Item | Treatment 2 | SEM 3 | p Value | Response to CB | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON | AM | CBL | CBM | CBH | Linear | Quadratic | |||
21 days | |||||||||
GLU (mmol/L) | 10.67 | 10.98 | 10.50 | 10.50 | 9.45 | 0.175 | 0.055 | 0.041 | 0.255 |
TC (mmol/L) | 3.34 | 4.12 | 3.53 | 3.24 | 3.63 | 0.120 | 0.156 | 0.658 | 0.725 |
TG (mmol/L) | 0.32 ab | 0.39 a | 0.30 b | 0.35 ab | 0.35 ab | 0.010 | 0.048 | 0.174 | 0.737 |
TP (g/L) | 26.50 | 23.12 | 24.80 | 26.08 | 24.63 | 0.565 | 0.361 | 0.470 | 0.925 |
ALB (g/L) | 12.00 | 10.65 | 12.28 | 12.15 | 11.33 | 0.257 | 0.229 | 0.418 | 0.351 |
UREA (mmol/L) | 0.53 ab | 0.59 a | 0.41 b | 0.49 ab | 0.43 b | 0.020 | 0.011 | 0.303 | 0.440 |
CREA (μmol/L) | 9.05 b | 11.92 a | 11.15 ab | 11.03 ab | 10.45 ab | 0.297 | 0.022 | 0.142 | 0.036 |
39 days | |||||||||
GLU (mmol/L) | 10.50 | 11.09 | 10.83 | 10.86 | 9.59 | 0.182 | 0.066 | 0.107 | 0.036 |
TC (mmol/L) | 3.57 ab | 2.95 b | 3.32 ab | 4.24 a | 3.43 ab | 0.122 | 0.008 | 0.607 | 0.223 |
TG (mmol/L) | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.014 | 0.401 | 0.814 | 0.471 |
TP (g/L) | 31.85 | 27.15 | 35.73 | 32.05 | 32.87 | 0.966 | 0.071 | 0.948 | 0.486 |
ALB (g/L) | 11.38 a | 9.48 b | 12.38 a | 11.73 a | 11.83 a | 0.252 | 0.001 | 0.721 | 0.311 |
UREA (mmol/L) | 0.44 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.022 | 0.069 | 0.798 | 0.523 |
CREA (μmol/L) | 9.75 | 11.43 | 12.17 | 10.57 | 10.35 | 0.288 | 0.055 | 0.935 | 0.025 |
a,b Means within a row with different letters differ (p < 0.05). Results are given as means, n = 6. 1 GLU, glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total triacylglycerol; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; UREA, urea; CREA, creatinine. 2 The broilers were fed with CON, the basal diet; AM, the basal diet with 150 mg/kg of aureomycin; CBL, the basal diet with C. butyricum at 2 × 108 CFU/kg; CBM, the basal diet with C. butyricum at 4 × 108 CFU/kg; and CBH, the basal diet with C. butyricum at 8 × 108 CFU/kg. 3 SEM, standard error of the mean.