Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;12(3):540. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030540
Background Factors
  Client factors Including whether they have pet insurance, health literacy, attitudes, behaviour in consultation
  Veterinarian’s clinical experience and confidence Include communication skills
  Veterinarian’s attitudes to antimicrobial use and AMR How concerned do they feel?
  Habits
  Veterinarians’ workload, energy, time
  Workplace factors Including culture, policies and procedures, location
  Other
Behavioural beliefs
  Fear of clinical deterioration Include downstream consequences
  Fear of failing to meet client expectations Include downstream consequences
  Perceived impact of withholding antimicrobials Will it make a difference?
  Time and workflow issues What are the alternatives to giving antimicrobials in this situation? What is the work impact of that?
Normative beliefs
  Employer and colleagues Expectations regarding antimicrobial use, contribution to practice profit, etc.
  Pet owner E.g., pre-existing expectations of receiving antimicrobials, awareness of AMR
  Veterinary Board Potential for complaints and professional reprimand
  Other Undergraduate lecturers, etc.
Control beliefs
  Availability of non-antibiotic treatment options e.g., probiotics
  Client factors Including capacity to undertake non-antimicrobial therapy, or to competently ‘watch and wait’
  Diagnostic uncertainty and action bias Feeling that you need to ‘do something’ even if you don’t know what you’re treating
  Time pressure Include availability of para-veterinary staff
Veterinarians’ suggestions for improving antimicrobial use
Veterinarian education and training Webinars on antimicrobial use, communication skills
Para-veterinary staff education and training Avoid setting client expectations of antimicrobials, enable non-antimicrobial treatment options
Client education Improved understanding of AMR
Workplace culture
Informational resources Prescribing guidelines, webinars, other
Audit and sanctions