Table 2.

Variable name, number of complete cases out of 612, range of responses, skew, skew standard error, kurtosis, kurtosis standard error.

Variable	Complete Cases	Range	Skew	S.E.	Kurtosis	S.E.
Gender	612	(0.00, 1.00)	−0.240	0.099	−1.941	0.197
Physical Neglect	593	(1.00, 3.80)	1.438	0.100	1.223	0.200
Emotional Abuse	593	(1.00, 5.00)	1.583	0.100	2.318	0.200
Sexual Abuse	593	(1.00, 5.00)	2.734	0.100	7.083	0.200
Physical Abuse	594	(1.00, 5.00)	2.132	0.100	4.640	0.200
Emotionally Supportive Family	592	(1.00, 5.00)	−0.796	0.100	0.094	0.201
Coping Motives for Drinking	585	(1.00, 5.00)	0.916	0.101	0.190	0.202
Impaired Control Over Alcohol (IC)	610	(1.00, 4.10)	0.760	0.099	−0.121	0.198
Alcohol Use Quantity/Frequency	610	(0.70, 3.29)	−0.418	0.099	−0.478	0.178
Alcohol-Related Problems	579	(0.00, 4.37)	1.781	0.102	4.894	0.203

Note: We had complete data for 94.61% of our sample of 612 cases (270 women; 342 men). Due to data collection occurring with the Qualtrics online survey tool, we did not experience extreme outliers for any of our measures. Moreover, our measures of skew and kurtosis suggest that our variables are in the acceptable range for normality in our path model. Brown [82] suggests that one has acceptable values for skew if they do not exceed + or − 3.00, and that kurtosis values are acceptable if they do not exceed + or − 10.00.