Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 24;12(3):570. doi: 10.3390/antiox12030570

Table 2.

Risk of bias assessment according to the SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies.

Studies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ayazi, 2014 [32] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Bai et al., 2019 [33] - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - -
Dai et al., 2011 [34] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Hu et al., 2015a [21] - - ? ? ? + ? ? - -
Hu et al., 2015b [22] - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - -
Jazideh et al., 2014 [35] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Sifa et al., 2018 [16] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Wu et al., 2018 [9] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Wu et al., 2020 [36] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Dai et al., 2009 [37] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -
Hu et al., 2020a [23] - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - -
Hu et al., 2020b [38] - - ? ? ? ? ? ? - -
Hu et al., 2016 [39] - - ? ? ? - ? ? - -

Abbreviations: 1: sequence generation; 2: baseline characteristic; 3: allocation concealment; 4: random housing; 5: blinding (performance bias); 6: random outcome assessment; 7: blinding (detection bias); 8: incomplete outcome data; 9: selective outcome reporting; 10: other sources of bias; “-“: low risk; “?”: unclear risk; “+”: high risk.