Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 11;11(3):855. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030855

Table 1.

Global parameters of CA-CPR. The significance levels were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test.

Experimental Groups
Intervention: Ctrl. (NaCl 0,9%) Pep19-2.5 Pep19-4LF
n = 37 n = 34 n = 37
Parameter Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD p Value
Baseline before CA
heart rate (1/min)
MAP (mm Hg)
body temperature (°C)
210.78 ± 23.81 220.71 ± 23.52 220.34 ± 25.15 0.141
64.95 ± 8.26 68.79 ± 9.03 70.32 ± 7.67 0.021 *
36.21 ± 0.28 36.06 ± 0.20 36.10 ± 0.20 0.033
CA
ROSC time (s)
dosage epinephrine (μg)
extubation (min)
63.32 ± 27.74 70.76 ± 37.43 64.39 ± 43.85 0.375
13.38 ± 3.14 14.04 ± 3.84 12.89 ± 3.61 0.276
169.53 ± 17.81 171.31 ± 14.22 175.06 ± 17.86 0.376
1 h after CA
heart rate (1/min) 328.56 ± 75.80 352.00 ± 88.82 337.91 ± 78.92 0.763
MAP (mm Hg) 57.33 ± 8.98 56.00 ± 4.86 52.67 ± 2.92 0.592
body temperature (°C) 36.25 ± 0.26 36.30 ± 0.35 36.33 ± 0.27 0.379
2 h after CA
heart rate (1/min) 273.57 ± 71.99 298.64 ± 75.87 300.11 ± 76.86 0.448
MAP (mm Hg) 57.80 ± 7.52 55.00 ± 0.00 53.00 ± 2.00 0.664
body temperature (°C) 36.36 ± 0.36 36.39 ± 0.34 36.44 ± 0.31 0.356

* In controls, blood pressure before the induced cardiac arrest was lower than in peptide-treated groups. When considered pairwise, blood pressure was significantly higher in Pep19-4LF (p = 0.008), and in Pep19-2.5, the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.054). Before cardiac arrest induction, body temperature was lower in Pep19-2.5-treated animals, but when considered pairwise, the difference was significant only compared to control animals (p = 0.010), but not compared to Pep19-4LF (p = 0.099).