Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 27;10(3):303. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030303

Table 2.

Outcomes of the selected studies.

Study Sample Size Implantation Rate Biochemical Pregnancy Rate Clinical Pregnancy Rate Live Birth Rate Miscarriage Rate
Control PRP Control PRP Control PRP Control PRP Control PRP Control PRP
Allahveisi et al., 2020 25 25 36%
(n = 9)
28%
(n = 7)
NR NR 36%
(n = 9)
28%
(n = 7)
28%
(n = 6)
24%
(n = 7)
NR NR
Eftekhar et al., 2018 43 40 9.37% * 21% * 24.2%
(n = 8)
42.4%
(n = 14)
18.2%
(n = 6)
39.4%
(n = 13)
18.2%
(n = 6)
33.3%
(n = 11)
6%
(n = 2)
9%
(n = 3)
Ershadi et al., 2022 45 40 0.38 ± 0.16% 0.36 ± 0.24% 27% (n = 12) 40% (n = 16) 24% (n = 11) 33% (n = 13) NR NR 31.25% (n = 5) 8.33% (n = 1)
Nazari et al., 2020 48 49 NR NR 27.08%
(n = 13)
53.06%
(n = 26)
16.66%
(n = 8)
44.89%
(n = 22)
NR NR NR NR
Nazari et al., 2019 30 30 NR NR 6.7%
(n = 2)
40%
(n = 12)
3.3%
(n = 1)
33.3%
(n = 10)
NR NR NR NR
Nazari et al., 2021 197 196 NR NR 24.87%
(n = 49)
51.53%
(n = 101)
19.28%
(n = 38)
48.97%
(n = 96)
5.58%
(n = 11)
39.28%
(n = 77)
NR NR
Nazari et al., 2022 20 20 NR NR NR NR 20% (n = 4) 35% (n = 7) 0% (n = 0) 15% (n = 3) 20% (n = 4) 20% (n = 4)
Obidniak et al., 2017 45 45 20.9% * 40.5% * NR NR 24.4%
(n = 11)
53.3%
(n = 24)
NR NR NR NR
Zamaniyan et al., 2020 43 55 34.9%
(n = 15)
63.6%
(n = 35)
23.3%
(n = 10)
36.2%
(n = 20)
23.3%
(n = 10)
52.7%
(n = 29)
NR NR 4.6%
(n = 2)
1.8%
(n = 1)
Zargar et al., 2021 40 40 5%
(n = 2)
15%
(n = 6)
NR NR 2.5%
(n = 1)
12.5%
(n = 5)
2.5%
(n = 1)
12.5%
(n = 5)
2.5%
(n = 1)
2.5%
(n = 1)

* Data excluded from the meta-analysis; NR: not reported.