Table 3.
Country | Botanical Origin | Extracts | Used Methods | Key Results | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morocco | Coriandrum sativum | Aqueous extract | DPPH | IC50 = 0.39 ± 0.13 mg/mL | [138] |
Ferric reducing power | IC50 = 0.54 ± 0.53 mg/mL | ||||
Total antioxidant capacity | 56.92 ± 0.21 mg AAE/g | ||||
Algeria | Monofloral samples: wild carrot, rosemary, and eucalyptus |
Methanolic extract | Molybdate ion reduction Assay | 101.58 ugGAE/g | [165] |
Brazil | Monofloral: Brassica genus; Brassica rapa; Astrocaryum; Aculeatissimum; Cocos nucifera; Myrcia; Alternanthera; M. scabrella; Eucalyptus; Coffea; M. scabrella; M. verrucosa; Eupatorium; Syagrus; A. aculeatissimum; Eupatorium; Myrcia; Cecropia; Myrcia; Alternanthera; M. caesalpiniifolia; Montanoa; Asteraceae; C. nucifera; Machaerium; M. caesalpiniifolia; Myrcia; Anadenanthera; Cecropia; Schinus; Ilex; Ricinus |
Ethanolic extract | DPPH | 140 ± 5 mmol TE/g | [150] |
ORAC | 563 ± 15 mmol TE/g | ||||
Brazil | Mimosa misera, Mimosa caesalpinifolia, Eythrina velutina, Ziziphus lotus, Prosopis juliflora, Mimosa tenuiflora, Piptadenia macrocarpa, Cautarea hexandra, Hyptis suavelens, Cautarea hexandra, and Maytenus rigida | Ethanolic extract | β-carotene bleaching method | Antioxidant activity = 83.3% | [168] |
Brazil | Heterofloral: Arecaceae, Asteraceae baccharis, and Asteraceae eupatorium |
Hydroethanolic extract | FRAP | 131.47 ± 75.08 mg GA eq/g | [145] |
DPPH | % inhibition = 72.46 ± 5.25% | ||||
Brazil | Arecaceae; Asteraceae baccharis; Asteraceae eupatorium; Brassicaceae | Lyophilized extract | ABTS | 120.10 ± 0.21 mmol TEAC/g | [145] |
DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 54.42 ± 0.23% | ||||
FRAP | 60.64 ± 0.63 mmol of Fe2þ/g | ||||
β-carotene/linoleic acid Assay | Antioxidant activity = 91.93 ± 0.22% | ||||
Brazil | ND | Hydroethanolic extract | DPPH | EC50 = 0.86 mg/mL | [151] |
FRAP | 123.4 mgGAEq.100 g−1 | ||||
β-carotene/linoleic acid Assay | Antioxidant activity = 83.3% | ||||
Chile | Tilia Tuan Szyszyl | Aqueous extract |
DPPH | IC50 = 2.36 mg/mL | [161] |
Superoxide-scavenging activity | IC50 = 2.29 mg/mL | ||||
Methanolic extract | DPPH | IC50 = 1.72 mg/mL | |||
Superoxide-scavenging activity | IC50 = 3.48 mg/mL | ||||
China |
Agastache rugosatache rugosa Brassica napus L. Camellia japonica L. Crataegus pinnatifi Dendranthema indicum L. Fagopyrum esculentum moench Helianthus annuus L. Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn. Phellodendron amurensis Prunus armeniaca Prunus persica L. Rosa rugosa Thunb. Schisandra chinensis Taraxacum mongolicum |
Hydroethanolic extract | ABTS | 1.06 ± 0.02 mmol TE g−1 | [169] |
DPPH | IC50 = 1.28 ± 0.03 mg/mL | ||||
Reducing power | Antioxidant activity = 70.55 ± 0.00% | ||||
China |
Lotus uligionosus, Escallonia rubra |
Aqueous extract | DPPH | 119.9 eq/g | [157] |
Reducing power | 69.5 eq/g | ||||
Egypt | Trifolium alexandrinum L. | Ethanolic extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 90% | [144] |
Petroleum ether | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 75% | |||
Dichloromethane | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 63% | |||
Ethyl acetate | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 79% | |||
Egypt | Zea mays | Methanolic extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 59% | [162] |
ABTS | Antioxidant activity = 76.51% | ||||
Greece | Monofloral sample: Brassica sp. Heterofloral sample: Cistus sp. (Cistaceae), Verbascum sp. (Scrophulariaceae), Trifolium sp. (Leguminosae), Prunus sp. (Rosaceae), Rubus sp. (Rosaceae), Asphodelus sp. (Liliaceae), and Persea americana (Lauraceae) |
Aqueous extract | DPPH | IC50 = 233.3 ± 6.1 μg/mL | [147] |
ABTS | IC50 = 56.2 ± 0.8 μg/mL | ||||
Italy | Genus: Hedera, Helianthus, Cistus, Cornus, Brassica, Gledistia, Hedysarum, Trifolium, Castanea, lamium, Magnolia, Fraxinus, Papaver, Crataegus, Prunus, Rubus, and Cordiandrum |
Aqueous/methanol extract | ORAC | 839.5 ± 49.5 μmol TE g−1 DW | [140] |
ABTS | 224.6 ± 18.6 μmol TE g−1 DW | ||||
DPPH | 134.7 ± 4.3 μmol TE g−1 DW | ||||
Korea | Monofloral samples: Quercus palustris, Actinidia arguta, Robinia pseudoacacia, and Amygdalus persica. |
Ethanolic extract | DPPH | EC50 = 292.0 ± 13.05 μg/mL | [170] |
Portugal | Cistus ladanifer, Echium spp., Apiaceae, and Cistaceae | Hydroethanolic extract | DPPH | EC50 = 2.62 ± 0.09 mg/mL | [146] |
Reducing power Assay | 6.51 ± 0.30 mg GAE/mL | ||||
Portugal | Cistacae Boraginacae, Rosaceae, Fagaceae, Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Ericaceae, Mimosaceae, and Myrtaceae. | Methanolic extract | DPPH | EC50 = 3.0 ± 0.7 mg/mL | [155] |
β-carotene bleaching Assays | EC50 = 4.6 mg/mL | ||||
Spain | Cistaceae, Fabaceae, Cistaceae, Ericaceae, Fabaceae, Cistaceae, Ericaceae, and Boraginaceae | Methanolic extract | DPPH | EC50 = 2.98 ± 0.47 mg/mg extract | [164] |
TBARS | EC50 = 0.35 ± 0.02 mg/mg extract | ||||
Turkey | ND | Methanolic extract | FRAP | 11.77 ± 0.63–105.06 ± 0.59 mmol Trolox/g pollen | [167] |
DPPH | SC50 = 0.65–8.20 mg/mL | ||||
CUPRAC Assay | 33.1 ± 0.4–91.8 ± 1.8 mmol Trolox/g pollen | ||||
Turkey | Centaurea sp, Lotus sp., Coronilla sp., Centaurea sp., Scabiosa sp., Euphorbia sp., Echium sp., Coronilla sp., Teucrium sp., Crepis sp., and Castanea sativa | Ethanolic extract | ABTS | 0.373 ± 0.015–5.980 ± 0.100 mg TEAC/g | [160] |
DDPH Assays | 1.293 ± 0.031–3.85 ± 0.030 mg TEAC/g | ||||
Turkey | Commercial bee pollen | Extractable fraction | CUPRAC Assay | 6.25–64.88 μmol TE/g | [152] |
ABTS | 6.20–38.20 μmol TE/g | ||||
DPPH | 0.44–22.45 μmol TE/g | ||||
Hydrolysable fraction | CUPRAC Assay | 69.16–192.96 μmol TE/g | |||
ABTS | 37.63–80.49 μmol TE/g | ||||
DPPH | 33.21–62.37 μmol TE/g | ||||
Bio-accessible fraction | CUPRAC Assay | 83.24–257.27 μmol TE/g | |||
ABTS | 48.96–111.40 μmol TE/g | ||||
DPPH | 35.69–83.84 μmol TE/g | ||||
Turkey | ND | Methanolic extract | CUPRAC Assay | 0.02 ± 0.02–0.24 ± 0.04 mmol Trolox/g | [166] |
FRAP | 8.69 ± 1.64–84.89 ± 10.09μmol FeSO4.7H2O/g | ||||
DPPH | SC50 =0.47 ± 0.51–0.84 ± 0.17 mg/mL | ||||
Poland | Aesculus hippocastanum, Chamerion angustifolium, Lamium purpureum, Lupinus polyphyllus, Malus domestica, Phacelia tanacetifolia, Pyrus communis, Robinia pseudoacacia, Sinapis alba, Taraxacum officinale, Trifolium sp., and Zea mays. | Pepsin-digested extract | DPPH | EC50 = 20.912 ± 0.821 μL/mL | [159] |
ABTS | 1.752 ± 0.024 mmol Trolox/g | ||||
Malaysia | ND | Ethanolic extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 39% | [163] |
Serbia | Helianthus annuus L. | Methanolic extract | ABTS | Antioxidant activity = 95.5% | [158] |
FRAP | A700 nm = 0.738 | ||||
Ethanolic extract | ABTS | Antioxidant activity = 75% | |||
FRAP | A700 nm = 0.485 | ||||
Slovakia | Helianthus annuus L. | Ethanolic extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 47.97 ± 0.29–50.46 ± 0.43% | [153] |
Slovakia | Monofloral samples: Brassica napus L. var. napus, Helianthus annuus L., Papaver somniferum L., Phacelia tanacetifolia L., Robinia pseudoacacia L., and Trifolium repens L. |
Methanolic extract | ABTS | 0.83 ± 0.10–2.08 ± 0.25 mm/l | [148] |
DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 25.96 ± 1.61–93.69 ± 5.80% | ||||
Aqueous extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 19.66 ± 1.06–50.29 ± 3.05% | |||
Slovakia | Monofloral samples: Brassica napus subsp. napus L, Papaver somniferum L., and Helianthus annuus L |
Ethanolic extract | DPPH | Antioxidant activity = 70.05± 17.17% | [154] |
Reduction power | 3575.56 ± 749.04 μg. mL−1 | ||||
Thailand | Commercial bee pollen | Ethanolic extract | DPPH | 40.69 ± 3.01 mg GAE/g extract | [156] |
Aqueous extract | DPPH | 21.27 ± 2.63 mg GAE/g extract | |||
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Poaceae spp., Trifolium spp., Zea mays, and Plantago spp. |
Methanolic extract | DPPH | IC50 = 1.43 ± 0.00 mg/g | [143] |
FRAP | 4.111 ± 0.136 mmol Fe+2/g | ||||
ABTS | Antioxidant activity = 86.13 ± 2.28% |
ND: Not determined.