Table 2.
Global factor score | Memory factor score | Executive function factor score | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Effect size | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Effect size | Estimate (95% CI) | p-value | Effect size | |
Time | − 0.002 (− 0.017, 0.013) | 0.76 | - | 0.028 (0.009, 0.047) | 0.004 ** | - | − 0.023 (− 0.039, − 0.008) | 0.003 ** | - |
Time2 | − 0.004 (− 0.004, − 0.004) | < 0.001 *** | - | − 0.003 (− 0.003, − 0.002) | < 0.001 *** | - | − 0.004 (− 0.005, − 0.004) | < 0.001 *** | - |
CR index | 0.381 (0.330, 0.432) | < 0.001 *** | 0.43 | 0.327 (0.268, 0.386) | < 0.001 *** | 0.38 | 0.356 (0.300, 0.411) | < 0.001 *** | 0.42 |
APOE-ε2 | − 0.015 (− 0.117, 0.087) | 0.77 | 0.02 | − 0.029 (− 0.146, 0.088) | 0.63 | 0.03 | − 0.039 (− 0.150, 0.072) | 0.49 | 0.05 |
APOE-ε4 | − 0.012 (− 0.085, 0.061) | 0.74 | 0.01 | − 0.002 (− 0.085, 0.081) | 0.96 | 0.00 | − 0.028 (− 0.107, 0.050) | 0.48 | 0.03 |
CR index × time | 0.002 (− 0.005, 0.009) | 0.53 | 0.03 | 0.003 (− 0.004, 0.011) | 0.39 | 0.05 | − 0.001 (− 0.007, 0.005) | 0.83 | 0.01 |
APOE-ε2 × time | 0.005 (− 0.008, 0.018) | 0.46 | 0.07 | 0.003 (− 0.012, 0.017) | 0.71 | 0.04 | 0.004 (− 0.007, 0.016) | 0.47 | 0.07 |
APOE-ε4 × time | − 0.022 (− 0.031, − 0.012) | < 0.001 *** | 0.30 | − 0.024 (− 0.035, − 0.014) | < 0.001 *** | 0.33 | − 0.014 (− 0.023, − 0.006) | < 0.001 *** | 0.24 |
CR index × APOE-ε2 | − 0.007 (− 0.136, 0.123) | 0.92 | 0.01 | 0.012 (− 0.136, 0.159) | 0.88 | 0.01 | − 0.020 (− 0.160, 0.120) | 0.78 | 0.02 |
CR index × APOE-ε4 | − 0.096 (− 0.185, − 0.008) | 0.03 * | 0.11 | − 0.052 (− 0.153, 0.049) | 0.31 | 0.06 | − 0.086 (− 0.182, 0.009) | 0.08 | 0.10 |
CR index × APOE-ε2 × time | 0.008 (− 0.008, 0.024) | 0.33 | 0.11 | 0.011 (− 0.007, 0.030) | 0.22 | 0.16 | 0.008 (− 0.007, 0.022) | 0.30 | 0.12 |
CR index × APOE-ε4 × time | 0.012 (0.000, 0.023) | 0.04 * | 0.16 | 0.016 (0.003, 0.029) | 0.01 * | 0.22 | 0.007 (− 0.003, 0.017) | 0.16 | 0.12 |
Separate models were estimated for the global, episodic memory, and executive function factor scores. Results of the full models including the 3-way interaction terms are shown; the patterns of results shown were the same when non-significant 3-way interaction terms were excluded. Models were additionally adjusted for baseline age, sex and cohort (ACS, AIBL, BIOCARD, BLSA, WRAP), and their interactions with time. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05. In all models, the coefficients for time reflect the starting trend of the trajectories (time = 0) whereas the coefficients for time2 reflect the change in trend over time