Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2019 May 30;380(22):2104–2115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817249

Table 2.

Summary of Response Rates and Minimal Residual Disease Status in the Intention-to-Treat Population.*

Variable Daratumumab Group (N = 368) Control Group (N = 369) P Value
Overall response — no. (% [95% CI]) 342 (92.9 [89.8–95.3]) 300 (81.3 [76.9–85.1]) <0.001
Best overall response — no. (%)
 Complete response or better 175 (47.6) 92 (24.9) <0.001
  Stringent complete response 112 (30.4) 46 (12.5)
  Complete response 63 (17.1) 46 (12.5)
 Very good partial response or better 292 (79.3) 196 (53.1) <0.001
 Very good partial response 117 (31.8) 104 (28.2)
 Partial response 50 (13.6) 104 (28.2)
 Stable disease 11 (3.0) 56 (15.2)
 Progressive disease 1 (03) 0
 Response could not be evaluated 14 (3.8) 13 (3.5)
Negative status for minimal residual disease — no. (%)§ 89 (24.2) 27 (7.3) <0.001
*

Response was assessed on the basis of International Myeloma Working Group recommendations (details on the criteria for disease responses are provided in the protocol). The following secondary end points were tested sequentially, each with an overall two-sided alpha level of 0.05, with the use of a hierarchical testing approach: complete response or better, very good partial response or better, negative status for minimal residual disease, and overall response.

The P value was calculated with the use of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel chi-square test.

Criteria for a stringent complete response include the criteria for a complete response plus a normal free light-chain ratio and absence of clonal plasma cells, as assessed by immunofluorescence or immunohistochemical analysis or by two-color to four-color flow cytometry.

§

The threshold for minimal residual disease was defined as 1 tumor cell per 105 white cells. Status regarding minimal residual disease is based on a postrandomization assessment performed on bone marrow samples with the use of a validated next-generation sequencing assay (clonoSEQ Assay, version 2.0; Adaptive Biotechnologies) in accordance with International Myeloma Working Group guidelines on assessment of minimal residual disease.23

The P value was calculated with the use of the Fisher’s exact test.