Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;13(3):436. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030436

Table 2.

Effects of EA on the SPT (n = 10; x¯ ± s; %).

Groups 0 Week 1 Week 2 Weeks 3 Weeks 4 Weeks 5 Weeks 6 Weeks 7 Weeks 8 Weeks
CON 90.93 ± 1.12 90.13 ± 1.16 90.48 ± 0.96 90.66 ± 0.69 90.29 ± 1.26 90.68 ± 0.80 90.41 ± 1.03 90.24 ± 0.90 90.08 ± 0.87
CUMS 90.56 ± 1.14 85.93 ± 0.66 ** 70.52 ± 2.26 58.48 ± 1.53 56.22 ± 1.18 56.30 ± 1.19 ** 55.91 ± 0.88 ** 55.94 ± 0.80 ** 56.17 ± 0.89 **
BBG 90.60 ± 1.27 85.16 ± 0.93 ** 69.10 ± 2.16 59.38 ± 2.52 56.69 ± 1.60 55.89 ± 1.17 ** 62.42 ± 1.27 ◊◊ 72.00 ± 1.32 ◊◊ 83.49 ± 0.93 ◊◊
EA 90.55 ± 1.15 85.11 ± 0.81 ** 69.92 ± 1.91 59.14 ± 1.48 56.85 ± 1.60 55.63 ± 1.01 ** 58.22 ± 2.33 62.80 ± 1.65 ◊◊□□ 72.80 ± 1.63 ◊◊□□

Data were expressed as mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01, compared with the CON group; ◊◊ p < 0.01, compared with the CUMS group; □□ p < 0.01, compared with the BBG group.