Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;15(6):1789. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061789

Table 3.

Secondary outcomes.

Overall Study Sample
Outcome No. of Studies No. of Patients Odds Ratio (95% CI) Within-Group Heterogeneity (I2)
Sample adequacy 4 Stent: 598
No stent: 595
1.06 (0.67–1.67)
p = 0.81
0%
Diagnostic sensitivity 5 Stent: 922
No stent: 1025
0.59 (0.44–0.80)
p < 0.001
14%
Outcome No. of Studies No. of patients Mean difference (95% CI) Within-group heterogeneity (I2)
Number of needle passes 6 Stent: 794
No stent: 1083
−0.09 (−0.30 to 0.11)
p = 0.38
86%
Plastic stent
Outcome No. of Studies No. of patients Odds ratio (95% CI) Within-group heterogeneity (I2)
Sample adequacy 3 Stent: 298
No stent: 425
1.35 (0.71–2.55)
p = 0.36
0%
Diagnostic sensitivity 4 Stent: 515
No stent: 920
0.68 (0.42–1.10)
p = 0.12
45%
Metal stent
Outcome No. of Studies No. of patients Odds ratio (95% CI) Within-group heterogeneity (I2)
Sample adequacy 2 Stent: 202
No stent: 351
1.10 (0.55–2.20)
p = 0.79
0%
Diagnostic sensitivity 3 Stent: 332
No stent: 846
0.61 (0.43–0.86)
p = 0.006
0%